Model-driven validation of visual explanations for multimodal emotion recognition

Abstract AI-based emotion recognition approaches may benefit from the integration of multimodal data, but their explainability and validation is still a critical challenge. Indeed, the limited neurophysiological understanding of novel multimodal features, e.g. brain-heart interaction, can be insufficient to assess whether the AI-extracted physiological insights (i.e., the model explanations) accurately reflect the real underlying physiological processes. To validate the explanations obtained by an AI-based model in this context, we introduce a novel framework that autonomously identifies the optimal explanations for a black-box model used in emotion recognition. Our approach leverages a convolutional neural network to process BHI features, which are derived from EEG and HRV data and rearranged as images. A model-agnostic methodology is employed to extract local explanations, which are then dynamically evaluated to select the most accurate for representing specific emotional states. The effectiveness of the proposed framework is evaluated across multiple classification tasks, including up to 9-level arousal and valence emotion classification, as well as nine discrete emotions classification, using the MAHNOB-HCI and DEAP datasets. The system achieved remarkable accuracy levels, consistently reaching approximately 97–98% across all tasks. Furthermore, our dynamic selection framework revealed that Integrated Gradients outperformed other state-of-the-art explainable AI approaches in reliably capturing global explanations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Machine Learning
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-025-06921-y
Primary Topic
Emotion and Mood Recognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Model-driven validation of visual explanations for multimodal emotion recognition

Guido Gagliardi, Vincenzo Catrambone, Mario G. C. A. Cimino, Gaetano Valenza et al.
Machine Learning
Emotion and Mood Recognition
article

Model-driven validation of visual explanations for multimodal emotion recognition

Guido Gagliardi, Vincenzo Catrambone, Mario G. C. A. Cimino, Gaetano Valenza, Maarten De Vos, Antonio Luca Alfeo
article en

Abstract

Abstract AI-based emotion recognition approaches may benefit from the integration of multimodal data, but their explainability and validation is still a critical challenge. Indeed, the limited neurophysiological understanding of novel multimodal features, e.g. brain-heart interaction, can be insufficient to assess whether the AI-extracted physiological insights (i.e., the model explanations) accurately reflect the real underlying physiological processes. To validate the explanations obtained by an AI-based model in this context, we introduce a novel framework that autonomously identifies the optimal explanations for a black-box model used in emotion recognition. Our approach leverages a convolutional neural network to process BHI features, which are derived from EEG and HRV data and rearranged as images. A model-agnostic methodology is employed to extract local explanations, which are then dynamically evaluated to select the most accurate for representing specific emotional states. The effectiveness of the proposed framework is evaluated across multiple classification tasks, including up to 9-level arousal and valence emotion classification, as well as nine discrete emotions classification, using the MAHNOB-HCI and DEAP datasets. The system achieved remarkable accuracy levels, consistently reaching approximately 97–98% across all tasks. Furthermore, our dynamic selection framework revealed that Integrated Gradients outperformed other state-of-the-art explainable AI approaches in reliably capturing global explanations.

Machine LearningVol. 114(12)
University of Pisa (IT), Piaggio (Italy) (IT), Università degli Studi eCampus (IT), University of Florence (IT), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Emotion and Mood Recognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.