BIOS-01. CONDITIONAL SURVIVAL ANALYSIS IN IDH-MUTANT HIGH-GRADE GLIOMAS: AN USEFUL TOOL IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

Abstract BACKGROUND The median overall survival of patients with IDH-mutant high-grade gliomas (IDHm HGGs), including grade 3 oligodendroglioma (O3), grade 3 and 4 astrocytoma (A3, A4), is well known. While this information is useful at diagnosis, it fails to account for the evolving prognosis of patients who surpass initial survival expectations. The aim of our study is to estimate the conditional survival of patients with IDHm HGGs enrolled in the French national POLA cohort. MATERIAL AND METHODS We performed a conditional survival analysis to estimate the probability of being alive five additional years given survival at specific timepoints. We also performed a landmark survival analysis to estimate the overall survival in patients free from progression at five years. Results A total of 869 patients were included: 479 O3, 179 A3 and 211 A4. The mOS was 14.9 (95% confidence interval 12.7-NA), 11.3 (9.1-NA) and 5.8 (4.2-7.9) years, respectively. The estimated probability of being alive for an additional 5 years given survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was 83% (79-86%), 79% (74-84%), and 68% (41-84%) for O3; 77% (70-83%), 72% (62-81%), and NA for A3; and 54% (47-61%), 72% (61-80%), and NA for A4. 388 patients (235 O3, 85 A3, 68 A4) who were progression-free 5 years after diagnosis. From the 5-year landmark, their estimated survival probability for an additional 1, 5, and 10 years was 98.3% (96.6-100%), 87.5% (82.9-92.4%), and 74.1% (64.6-85.0%) for O3; 100% (100-100%), 87.5% (79.4-96.5%), and NA for A3; 96.8% (92.9-100%), 81.4% (71.3-92.9%), and NA for A4. Conclusions Conditional survival — defined as the probability of surviving a specified number of additional years given survival to a focus point — provides a useful and hopeful prognostic indicator in IDHm HGGs long-term survivors. These data should be taken into consideration to improve clinical decision-making and patient counseling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.0204
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

BIOS-01. CONDITIONAL SURVIVAL ANALYSIS IN IDH-MUTANT HIGH-GRADE GLIOMAS: AN USEFUL TOOL IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

Dominique Figarella‐Branger, Mathilde Ducloie, Veronique Bourg, Caroline Dehais et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

BIOS-01. CONDITIONAL SURVIVAL ANALYSIS IN IDH-MUTANT HIGH-GRADE GLIOMAS: AN USEFUL TOOL IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

Dominique Figarella‐Branger, Mathilde Ducloie, Veronique Bourg, Caroline Dehais, Damien Ricard, Carole Gourmelon, Stefania Cuzzubbo, Luc Bauchet, Charlotte Bronnimann, Philippe Meneï, Luc Taillandier, Clotilde Verlut, Élodie Vauléon, Alice Laurenge, Romain Appay, Thierry Faillot, Mohamed Khettab, Franck Bielle, Elizabeth Cohen‐Jonathan Moyal, Romuald Seizeur, Lisa Belin, François Ghiringhelli, Apolline Djelad, Élise Deluche, François Ducray, Émeline Tabouret, Mehdi Touat, Claude Gaultier, Olivier Chinot, Alain Carpentier, Philippe Colin, Alberto Pïcca, F. Dhermain, Ahmed Idbaïh, Carole Ramirez, Olivier Langlois, Nadia Younan
article en

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND The median overall survival of patients with IDH-mutant high-grade gliomas (IDHm HGGs), including grade 3 oligodendroglioma (O3), grade 3 and 4 astrocytoma (A3, A4), is well known. While this information is useful at diagnosis, it fails to account for the evolving prognosis of patients who surpass initial survival expectations. The aim of our study is to estimate the conditional survival of patients with IDHm HGGs enrolled in the French national POLA cohort. MATERIAL AND METHODS We performed a conditional survival analysis to estimate the probability of being alive five additional years given survival at specific timepoints. We also performed a landmark survival analysis to estimate the overall survival in patients free from progression at five years. Results A total of 869 patients were included: 479 O3, 179 A3 and 211 A4. The mOS was 14.9 (95% confidence interval 12.7-NA), 11.3 (9.1-NA) and 5.8 (4.2-7.9) years, respectively. The estimated probability of being alive for an additional 5 years given survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was 83% (79-86%), 79% (74-84%), and 68% (41-84%) for O3; 77% (70-83%), 72% (62-81%), and NA for A3; and 54% (47-61%), 72% (61-80%), and NA for A4. 388 patients (235 O3, 85 A3, 68 A4) who were progression-free 5 years after diagnosis. From the 5-year landmark, their estimated survival probability for an additional 1, 5, and 10 years was 98.3% (96.6-100%), 87.5% (82.9-92.4%), and 74.1% (64.6-85.0%) for O3; 100% (100-100%), 87.5% (79.4-96.5%), and NA for A3; 96.8% (92.9-100%), 81.4% (71.3-92.9%), and NA for A4. Conclusions Conditional survival — defined as the probability of surviving a specified number of additional years given survival to a focus point — provides a useful and hopeful prognostic indicator in IDHm HGGs long-term survivors. These data should be taken into consideration to improve clinical decision-making and patient counseling.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 27(Supplement_5)
Allen Institute for Brain Science (US), Lyon College (US), Université de Lille (FR), University of Reunion Island (RE), Hôpital Beaujon (FR), Institut Gustave Roussy (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon (FR), Lille’s Cardiology Hospital (FR), L’Institut du Cancer Courlancy Reims (FR), Hopitaux Civils de Colmar (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier (FR), Centre Georges François Leclerc (FR), Institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse Oncopole (FR), Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy (FR), Centre Eugène Marquis (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen Normandie (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Limoges (FR), Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (FR), Centre d'Investigation Clinique de Nantes (FR), Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest (FR), Peuplements végétaux et bioagresseurs en milieu tropical (RE), Hôpital d'instruction des Armées Percy (FR), Hôpital Saint-Louis (FR), Services déconcentrés d'appui à la recherche Occitanie-Montpellier (FR), Institut du Cerveau (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rouen (FR), Hôpital Foch (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne (FR), Hôpital de la Timone (FR), Université d'Angers (FR), Université de Rouen Normandie (FR), Nantes Université (FR), Université de Caen Normandie (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.