BIOM-49. CLINICAL UTILITY OF CEREBROSPINAL FLUID CELL-FREE DNA MOLECULAR PROFILING AS A DIAGNOSTIC ADJUNCT IN REAL-WORLD NEURO-ONCOLOGY
Abstract Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is under evaluation as a liquid biopsy tool across multiple neuro-oncologic indications, including diagnosing lesions of uncertain etiology, delineating progression from pseudoprogression, and confirming suspected leptomeningeal disease (LMD). We evaluated the real-world performance of CSF cfDNA sequencing for identification of variant alleles (VA) using targeted panel sequencing (PredicineCARE) and/or copy number alterations (CNA) using low-pass whole-genome sequencing (LPWGS; PredicineSCORE) in a diverse cohort across three aforementioned indications. From 82 adult patients, 93 samples (92.4% from lumbar puncture and 7.6% from ventriculoperitoneal shunt taps) were analyzed. For CNS progression, gliomas were most frequently evaluated (60%); for LMD, metastatic disease was most common (86.7%). Median CSF volume utilized for analysis was 4.60 mL (range: 0.40-7.50 mL). Median cfDNA yield was 0.29 ng/mL (range: 0.00–1037.74 ng/mL). For lesions of uncertain etiology (n=40 patients, 1 sample/patient), VAs were identified in 10 samples (25%); an additional 10 samples had sufficient cfDNA for LPWGS (25%). 50% of samples in this indication had insufficient cfDNA for testing. For suspected progression (n=26 patients, 35 samples), VAs were identified in 6 samples (17.1%); an additional 14 samples underwent LPWGS (40%); 15 had insufficient cfDNA for further testing (42.9%). For suspected LMD (n=16 patients, 18 samples), VAs were quantifiable in 4 samples (22.2%); LPWGS could be performed in an additional 9 (50%); 5 had insufficient cfDNA (27.8%). Across indications, identification of known tumor-associated alterations in CSF, including those confirmed previously by tissue, served as a non-surgical diagnostic adjunct. In some patients, targetable mutations could be identified via CSF. Conversely, absence of such alterations and/or low cfDNA yields may lower suspicion for active neuro-oncologic disease, when evaluated alongside clinical history. Despite modest cell-free DNA yield, CSF cfDNA evaluation provides valuable information to aid clinical decision-making across neuro-oncologic indications.
Authors
- Shidong Jia (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3823-8227)
- Terry C. Burns (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7633-3045)
- Tiantian Zheng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9080-7937)
- Rahul Kumar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9671-1146)
- Arthur E. Warrington (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3989-975X)
- Cécile Riviere-Cazaux (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8857-4345)
- Chao Dai (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9095-7444)
- Jie Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0260-1611)
- Pan Du (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7335-4078)
- Yong Huang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7031-9709)
Institutions
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Advanced Cell Diagnostics (United States) (US)
- Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Neuro-Oncology
- Published
- 2025-11-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.0137
- Primary Topic
- Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00