CTNI-57. PLANNED-USE GLUCARPIDASE FOR OUTPATIENT HIGH DOSE METHOTREXATE (HD-MTX) IN PATIENTS WITH CNS LYMPHOMA

Abstract INTRODUCTION HD-MTX is standard treatment for central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL). Administration typically requires hospitalization until drug clearance, due to toxicity risks. We previously demonstrated that glucarpidase, a bacterial recombinant enzyme that rapidly degrades MTX, facilitated outpatient MTX treatments during the COVID-19 pandemic. Here, we further assess feasibility of outpatient MTX with planned glucarpidase use. METHODS This prospective, non-randomized study included two cohorts. Cohort A received eight 14-day cycles of MTX 3.5 g/m2 and glucarpidase 2000u 24 hours later. Cohort B included rituximab 500 mg/m2, and 1000u glucarpidase in cycles 3-8 only. In both cohorts, cycles 1-2 were administered inpatient to ensure MTX tolerability, while cycles 3-8 were outpatient. Concurrent chemo/targeted therapies were permitted at physician discretion. The primary endpoint was serum MTX reduction 1 hour after glucarpidase. Patients not receiving at least 6 cycles of glucarpidase were replaced. RESULTS Eighteen patients consented (Cohort A: 4; Cohort B: 14). Twelve transitioned to outpatient MTX with glucarpidase; six disenrolled before outpatient treatment due to preference or elevated creatinine. Median age was 73.5 (range, 44-82), median Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) 80 (range, 60-90). One Cohort B patient withdrew after the first outpatient cycle due to preference. Remaining Cohort B patients completed all planned cycles. No hospital admissions or MTX dose-reductions occurred. Median MTX reduction 1 hour post-glucarpidase was 99.6% (range, 62.2-100%). Reduced clearance was noted in one Cohort A and three Cohort B patients; antibody analysis is ongoing. Treatment was well tolerated with no grade 3/4 adverse events attributed to glucarpidase. One Cohort A patient experienced a grade 2 allergic reaction. Grade 1 events included dizziness, fatigue (n=2), flushing, headache, infusion reaction, nausea, paresthesia, pruritus, and rash. CONCLUSIONS Planned-use glucarpidase enables safe and feasible outpatient MTX administration in healthy patients who have previously tolerated MTX.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.0553
Primary Topic
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CTNI-57. PLANNED-USE GLUCARPIDASE FOR OUTPATIENT HIGH DOSE METHOTREXATE (HD-MTX) IN PATIENTS WITH CNS LYMPHOMA

Katherine S. Panageas, Lisa Marie DeAngelis, Christian Grommes, Ryan Schofield et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
article

CTNI-57. PLANNED-USE GLUCARPIDASE FOR OUTPATIENT HIGH DOSE METHOTREXATE (HD-MTX) IN PATIENTS WITH CNS LYMPHOMA

Katherine S. Panageas, Lisa Marie DeAngelis, Christian Grommes, Ryan Schofield, Lauren R. Schaff, Ingo K. Mellinghoff, Anne S. Reiner, Mina Lobbous, Burt Nabors, Ashley Gonzalez, Dean Carlow, Laleh Emadi-Paramkouhi, Adam Kahleifeh
article en

Abstract

Abstract INTRODUCTION HD-MTX is standard treatment for central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL). Administration typically requires hospitalization until drug clearance, due to toxicity risks. We previously demonstrated that glucarpidase, a bacterial recombinant enzyme that rapidly degrades MTX, facilitated outpatient MTX treatments during the COVID-19 pandemic. Here, we further assess feasibility of outpatient MTX with planned glucarpidase use. METHODS This prospective, non-randomized study included two cohorts. Cohort A received eight 14-day cycles of MTX 3.5 g/m2 and glucarpidase 2000u 24 hours later. Cohort B included rituximab 500 mg/m2, and 1000u glucarpidase in cycles 3-8 only. In both cohorts, cycles 1-2 were administered inpatient to ensure MTX tolerability, while cycles 3-8 were outpatient. Concurrent chemo/targeted therapies were permitted at physician discretion. The primary endpoint was serum MTX reduction 1 hour after glucarpidase. Patients not receiving at least 6 cycles of glucarpidase were replaced. RESULTS Eighteen patients consented (Cohort A: 4; Cohort B: 14). Twelve transitioned to outpatient MTX with glucarpidase; six disenrolled before outpatient treatment due to preference or elevated creatinine. Median age was 73.5 (range, 44-82), median Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) 80 (range, 60-90). One Cohort B patient withdrew after the first outpatient cycle due to preference. Remaining Cohort B patients completed all planned cycles. No hospital admissions or MTX dose-reductions occurred. Median MTX reduction 1 hour post-glucarpidase was 99.6% (range, 62.2-100%). Reduced clearance was noted in one Cohort A and three Cohort B patients; antibody analysis is ongoing. Treatment was well tolerated with no grade 3/4 adverse events attributed to glucarpidase. One Cohort A patient experienced a grade 2 allergic reaction. Grade 1 events included dizziness, fatigue (n=2), flushing, headache, infusion reaction, nausea, paresthesia, pruritus, and rash. CONCLUSIONS Planned-use glucarpidase enables safe and feasible outpatient MTX administration in healthy patients who have previously tolerated MTX.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 27(Supplement_5)
Cleveland Clinic (US), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.