RADT-08. INCIDENCE AND RISK OF SYMPTOMATIC RADIATION NECROSIS FOLLOWING INTRACRANIAL BRACHYTHERAPY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Abstract PURPOSE Brachytherapy, offering highly localized radiation delivery while minimizing exposure to surrounding tissues, has reemerged as a promising treatment modality for primary and secondary brain tumors. Despite its usefulness, a significant complication seen following brachytherapy is symptomatic radiation necrosis (SRN). This meta-analysis aimed to estimate the pooled incidence of SRN following intracranial brachytherapy and explore associations between clinical and technical variables and SRN risk. METHODS Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) identified studies that reported rates of SRN following brachytherapy for brain tumors in human patients. A random effects generalized linear mixed model was used to pool SRN rates, with subgroup analyses based on clinical and technical variables. Study quality was assessed using NIH tools, and level of evidence was assigned according to Oxford criteria. RESULTS Eighty-three studies totaling 3,666 patients were included. The pooled incidence of SRN was 5.67% (95% CI: 3.84%–8.29%) with substantial heterogeneity (I² = 75.7%). Exclusion of lower-quality studies yielded a pooled incidence of 7.61% (95% CI: 6.46%–8.94%). Subgroup analyses by tumor type showed pooled SRN rates of 3.72% for low-grade gliomas, 8.44% for high-grade gliomas, 2.07% for brain metastases, and 8.98% for meningiomas. Isotope subgroup analysis demonstrated SRN rates of 5.83% for Iodine-125, 7.61% for Iridium-192, and 2.07% for Cesium-131. No statistically significant differences were observed between tumor types, isotopes, implantation methods, dose rates, or prior radiation status. CONCLUSION SRN presents as a complication of intracranial brachytherapy in approximately 5.7% of patients, a rate comparable to other focal radiation therapies. Despite not showing statistical significance, trends suggest that tumor type and isotope selection may influence RN risk. Brachytherapy remains a safe treatment option for appropriately selected patients, with future prospective studies needed to optimize strategies for minimizing and managing RN.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.0379
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RADT-08. INCIDENCE AND RISK OF SYMPTOMATIC RADIATION NECROSIS FOLLOWING INTRACRANIAL BRACHYTHERAPY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Netanel Ben-Shalom, Harshal A. Shah, Sandra Leskinen, A. Gabriella Wernicke et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
article

RADT-08. INCIDENCE AND RISK OF SYMPTOMATIC RADIATION NECROSIS FOLLOWING INTRACRANIAL BRACHYTHERAPY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Netanel Ben-Shalom, Harshal A. Shah, Sandra Leskinen, A. Gabriella Wernicke, John A. Boockvar, David J. Langer, Anthony M. Coelho, Randy S. D’Amico, Sean Inzerillo
article en

Abstract

Abstract PURPOSE Brachytherapy, offering highly localized radiation delivery while minimizing exposure to surrounding tissues, has reemerged as a promising treatment modality for primary and secondary brain tumors. Despite its usefulness, a significant complication seen following brachytherapy is symptomatic radiation necrosis (SRN). This meta-analysis aimed to estimate the pooled incidence of SRN following intracranial brachytherapy and explore associations between clinical and technical variables and SRN risk. METHODS Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) identified studies that reported rates of SRN following brachytherapy for brain tumors in human patients. A random effects generalized linear mixed model was used to pool SRN rates, with subgroup analyses based on clinical and technical variables. Study quality was assessed using NIH tools, and level of evidence was assigned according to Oxford criteria. RESULTS Eighty-three studies totaling 3,666 patients were included. The pooled incidence of SRN was 5.67% (95% CI: 3.84%–8.29%) with substantial heterogeneity (I² = 75.7%). Exclusion of lower-quality studies yielded a pooled incidence of 7.61% (95% CI: 6.46%–8.94%). Subgroup analyses by tumor type showed pooled SRN rates of 3.72% for low-grade gliomas, 8.44% for high-grade gliomas, 2.07% for brain metastases, and 8.98% for meningiomas. Isotope subgroup analysis demonstrated SRN rates of 5.83% for Iodine-125, 7.61% for Iridium-192, and 2.07% for Cesium-131. No statistically significant differences were observed between tumor types, isotopes, implantation methods, dose rates, or prior radiation status. CONCLUSION SRN presents as a complication of intracranial brachytherapy in approximately 5.7% of patients, a rate comparable to other focal radiation therapies. Despite not showing statistical significance, trends suggest that tumor type and isotope selection may influence RN risk. Brachytherapy remains a safe treatment option for appropriately selected patients, with future prospective studies needed to optimize strategies for minimizing and managing RN.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 27(Supplement_5)
Hofstra University (US), SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University (US), North Shore Diabetes and Endocrine Associates (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.