INNV-21. Initial experience with generative AI for clinical summarization in glioma MR interpretation

Abstract BACKGROUND Patients with primary brain tumors often have very complex histories, but an accurate understanding of their care timeline is critical to provide the best care possible. Extracting pertinent facts from the medical record can be time consuming and frustrating. We sought to apply generative AI large language models (LLM) to this problem in order to supply providers with concise, accurate, and focused data including graphs and tables. METHODS After evaluating multiple LLMs, GEMINI 2.5 Pro was selected. Prompt engineering was iteratively refined across a range of patients to generate concise outputs using tables, graphs, and prose to describe timing of chemoradiation, tumor markers, procedures, and trends in MRI results. The model inferred BT-RADS scores from the MRI report prose. Using a 5-point Likert scale, neuroradiologists assessed the AI-output both prospectively and retrospectively comparing it to the medical record. LLM’s compared AI summaries to source material. RESULTS Six neuroradiologists each ranked 25 prospective patient outputs as accurate (82%/16%/1%), useful (94%/6%/0%), trustworthy (86%/13%/1%), and satisfactory (86%/10%/1%) for Likert ratings of highly agree/agree/neutral, respectively. No responses were disagree or highly disagree. Interobserver agreement was high (Gwent AC2 > 0.95). The LLM evaluation of referenced portions of the record determined > 85% of summary statements were supported by source documents. While users estimated time savings of a 1-10 minutes per case, they felt the greater benefit was having more organized data presented efficiently. CONCLUSIONS AI summaries of the medical record of complex patients with primary brain tumors give providers an accurate, well-organized display of the pertinent facts necessary for high quality care and save time in chart review. These summaries, which are generated early each morning, have been found to be helpful and are now being incorporated into our clinical practice and multidisciplinary tumor board.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.0910
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

INNV-21. Initial experience with generative AI for clinical summarization in glioma MR interpretation

Ian T. Mark, Tim Kaufmann, David Black, Sadık Kara et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
article

INNV-21. Initial experience with generative AI for clinical summarization in glioma MR interpretation

Ian T. Mark, Tim Kaufmann, David Black, Sadık Kara, Carrie M. Carr, Daniel J. Blezek, Phillip John, M. D. Steven, Rydberg Charlotte, Passe Ted
article en

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Patients with primary brain tumors often have very complex histories, but an accurate understanding of their care timeline is critical to provide the best care possible. Extracting pertinent facts from the medical record can be time consuming and frustrating. We sought to apply generative AI large language models (LLM) to this problem in order to supply providers with concise, accurate, and focused data including graphs and tables. METHODS After evaluating multiple LLMs, GEMINI 2.5 Pro was selected. Prompt engineering was iteratively refined across a range of patients to generate concise outputs using tables, graphs, and prose to describe timing of chemoradiation, tumor markers, procedures, and trends in MRI results. The model inferred BT-RADS scores from the MRI report prose. Using a 5-point Likert scale, neuroradiologists assessed the AI-output both prospectively and retrospectively comparing it to the medical record. LLM’s compared AI summaries to source material. RESULTS Six neuroradiologists each ranked 25 prospective patient outputs as accurate (82%/16%/1%), useful (94%/6%/0%), trustworthy (86%/13%/1%), and satisfactory (86%/10%/1%) for Likert ratings of highly agree/agree/neutral, respectively. No responses were disagree or highly disagree. Interobserver agreement was high (Gwent AC2 > 0.95). The LLM evaluation of referenced portions of the record determined > 85% of summary statements were supported by source documents. While users estimated time savings of a 1-10 minutes per case, they felt the greater benefit was having more organized data presented efficiently. CONCLUSIONS AI summaries of the medical record of complex patients with primary brain tumors give providers an accurate, well-organized display of the pertinent facts necessary for high quality care and save time in chart review. These summaries, which are generated early each morning, have been found to be helpful and are now being incorporated into our clinical practice and multidisciplinary tumor board.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 27(Supplement_5)
Mayo Clinic (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.