INNV-06. Build it and they will come: Cognitive rehabilitation in primary brain tumor

Abstract BACKGROUND Cognitive impairment is common in primary brain tumors (PBT), with evidence for cognitive rehabilitation (CR), although with few studies of self-sustaining clinical programs. We conducted a retrospective analysis of a CR program to understand treatment engagement and goal attainment by cognitive and clinical characteristics in those referred with subjective complaints. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed records of adults with stable PBT and cognitive complaints referred to neuropsychological evaluation and +/- CR with cognitive and emotional assessments completed upon referral. Impairment type was defined as: absolute ≥ -1.5 SD on ≥ 2 tests, or relative ≥ -1.5 from premorbid intellect on ≥ 2 tests. SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) goal (partial or full) attainment was tracked with CR engagement defined as completing ≥ 2 sessions. Chi-square was used to evaluate associations with a two-sided <0.05 p-value threshold. RESULTS We identified 177 patients with PBT referred between May 2018 to May 2022. The mean age was 50 (SD=13.5); 76% had ≥16 years of education; median time since diagnosis was 35.2 months (IQR=85.4); 14% glioblastoma; 56% IDH-mutant; 34% grade 2; 74% prior radiotherapy; and 62% not working. Among those referred, 21% demonstrated relative and 73% absolute impairment (73% with impaired processing speed, 71% executive functioning, and 63% verbal learning). Of those referred and recommended, 124 (87%) engaged in CR (median 8 visits, IQR=9); 57% fully and 25% partially met their goals. CR engagement and goal achievement were not significantly associated with cognitive and emotional findings upon referral or other clinical factors (all p≥0.05). CONCLUSION We confirm that subjective complaints in PBT often have objective impairments and underscore the value of premorbid estimates, especially in highly educated patients. Our data demonstrates high rates of CR engagement when offered. Additional study is warranted to understand treatment response, durability, and the mechanism of action.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.0895
Primary Topic
Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

INNV-06. Build it and they will come: Cognitive rehabilitation in primary brain tumor

Susan Chang, Christina Weyer Jamora, Melissa Brie, Nancy Ann Oberheim-Bush et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
article

INNV-06. Build it and they will come: Cognitive rehabilitation in primary brain tumor

Susan Chang, Christina Weyer Jamora, Melissa Brie, Nancy Ann Oberheim-Bush, Tracy Luks, Jeenn Barreiro-Rosado, Shawn L. Hervey‐Jumper, Jennifer Clarke, Paige M. Bracci, John de Groot, Ellen Smith, Jennie Taylor, Nicholas Butowski, Kathleen Van Dyk, Rand Almonen
article en

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Cognitive impairment is common in primary brain tumors (PBT), with evidence for cognitive rehabilitation (CR), although with few studies of self-sustaining clinical programs. We conducted a retrospective analysis of a CR program to understand treatment engagement and goal attainment by cognitive and clinical characteristics in those referred with subjective complaints. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed records of adults with stable PBT and cognitive complaints referred to neuropsychological evaluation and +/- CR with cognitive and emotional assessments completed upon referral. Impairment type was defined as: absolute ≥ -1.5 SD on ≥ 2 tests, or relative ≥ -1.5 from premorbid intellect on ≥ 2 tests. SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) goal (partial or full) attainment was tracked with CR engagement defined as completing ≥ 2 sessions. Chi-square was used to evaluate associations with a two-sided <0.05 p-value threshold. RESULTS We identified 177 patients with PBT referred between May 2018 to May 2022. The mean age was 50 (SD=13.5); 76% had ≥16 years of education; median time since diagnosis was 35.2 months (IQR=85.4); 14% glioblastoma; 56% IDH-mutant; 34% grade 2; 74% prior radiotherapy; and 62% not working. Among those referred, 21% demonstrated relative and 73% absolute impairment (73% with impaired processing speed, 71% executive functioning, and 63% verbal learning). Of those referred and recommended, 124 (87%) engaged in CR (median 8 visits, IQR=9); 57% fully and 25% partially met their goals. CR engagement and goal achievement were not significantly associated with cognitive and emotional findings upon referral or other clinical factors (all p≥0.05). CONCLUSION We confirm that subjective complaints in PBT often have objective impairments and underscore the value of premorbid estimates, especially in highly educated patients. Our data demonstrates high rates of CR engagement when offered. Additional study is warranted to understand treatment response, durability, and the mechanism of action.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 27(Supplement_5)
City College of San Francisco (US), UCLA Health (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.