CNSC-51. SELINEXOR FOR THE TREATMENT OF GLIOMA: A RETROSPECTIVE CASE SERIES

Abstract BACKGROUND High grade gliomas are aggressive primary brain tumors. Following progression, treatment options are limited and prognosis is poor. The need for novel agents is unmet. Selinexor is an inhibitor of exportin-1 (XPO-1) currently approved for treatment of certain hematologic malignancies. A phase 2 study of single agent selinexor in glioma suggested modest response and variable tolerability. Here, we report our real-world institutional experience with the off-label use of selinexor for glioma. METHODS This is a single-center retrospective case series of patients with glioma treated with oral selinexor from January 1, 2020 to August 1, 2024. RESULTS Twenty-two patients were identified (men=12, women=9). Median age was 55 (range, 33–85), median Karnofsky Performance Status 80 (range, 50–90). Diagnoses included glioblastoma (n=20), H3K27M-altered glioma (n=1), and astrocytoma, IDH-mutated (n=1). Nineteen patients (86%) were treated for relapsed/refractory disease. Three (14%) were treated upfront, prior to progression. Median prior number of therapies was 2 (range, 0 – 5). Median starting dose of Selinexor was 50mg weekly (40 – 80) and median dose at the end of treatment was 70mg weekly (range, 40-80). Six patients (27%) tolerated dose increases and two patients (9%) required dose reductions. Median duration of therapy was 103 days (range, 4 – 636). All patients were given selinexor in combination with other therapy including radiation (n=2), tumor-treating fields (n=1), and medical therapy (n=20). Medical therapies included bevacizumab (n=15), temozolomide (n=10), and other therapies (n=3). Grade 3-4 laboratory toxicities included thrombocytopenia (n=1) and creatinine phosphokinase elevation (n=1). Observed non-laboratory toxicities included nausea (n=5), diarrhea (n=3), fatigue (n=8), gastrointestinal toxicities (n=3), and nephrotoxicity (n=1). CONCLUSION In our single institution experience, selinexor was well tolerated for glioma in conjunction with radiation, bevacizumab, temozolomide, and other medical therapies. No new safety signals were identified. Further research is required to characterize efficacy in patients with glioma.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.0259
Primary Topic
Nuclear Structure and Function
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CNSC-51. SELINEXOR FOR THE TREATMENT OF GLIOMA: A RETROSPECTIVE CASE SERIES

Andrew Lin, Lauren R. Schaff, Ingo K. Mellinghoff, Jessica Wilcox et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Nuclear Structure and Function
article

CNSC-51. SELINEXOR FOR THE TREATMENT OF GLIOMA: A RETROSPECTIVE CASE SERIES

Andrew Lin, Lauren R. Schaff, Ingo K. Mellinghoff, Jessica Wilcox, Alexandra Miller, Joshua Amit Budhu, Eli L. Diamond, Edward Lee, Adam Kahleifeh
article en

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND High grade gliomas are aggressive primary brain tumors. Following progression, treatment options are limited and prognosis is poor. The need for novel agents is unmet. Selinexor is an inhibitor of exportin-1 (XPO-1) currently approved for treatment of certain hematologic malignancies. A phase 2 study of single agent selinexor in glioma suggested modest response and variable tolerability. Here, we report our real-world institutional experience with the off-label use of selinexor for glioma. METHODS This is a single-center retrospective case series of patients with glioma treated with oral selinexor from January 1, 2020 to August 1, 2024. RESULTS Twenty-two patients were identified (men=12, women=9). Median age was 55 (range, 33–85), median Karnofsky Performance Status 80 (range, 50–90). Diagnoses included glioblastoma (n=20), H3K27M-altered glioma (n=1), and astrocytoma, IDH-mutated (n=1). Nineteen patients (86%) were treated for relapsed/refractory disease. Three (14%) were treated upfront, prior to progression. Median prior number of therapies was 2 (range, 0 – 5). Median starting dose of Selinexor was 50mg weekly (40 – 80) and median dose at the end of treatment was 70mg weekly (range, 40-80). Six patients (27%) tolerated dose increases and two patients (9%) required dose reductions. Median duration of therapy was 103 days (range, 4 – 636). All patients were given selinexor in combination with other therapy including radiation (n=2), tumor-treating fields (n=1), and medical therapy (n=20). Medical therapies included bevacizumab (n=15), temozolomide (n=10), and other therapies (n=3). Grade 3-4 laboratory toxicities included thrombocytopenia (n=1) and creatinine phosphokinase elevation (n=1). Observed non-laboratory toxicities included nausea (n=5), diarrhea (n=3), fatigue (n=8), gastrointestinal toxicities (n=3), and nephrotoxicity (n=1). CONCLUSION In our single institution experience, selinexor was well tolerated for glioma in conjunction with radiation, bevacizumab, temozolomide, and other medical therapies. No new safety signals were identified. Further research is required to characterize efficacy in patients with glioma.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 27(Supplement_5)
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), NYU Langone Health (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Nuclear Structure and Function
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.