DISP-30. Impact of distance traveled for clinical trial participation on clinical outcomes in patients with glioblastoma

Abstract BACKGROUND Patients with glioblastoma (GBM) often face limited access to clinical trials, particularly those living in rural or underserved regions. We investigated whether travel distance for trial participation is associated with survival among these patients. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults with recurrent or progressive high-grade glioma enrolled in clinical trials at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute between 1999 and 2018. Travel distance from residence to Dana-Farber was estimated using ZIP codes, yielding the median distance per visit. Overall survival (OS) from trial enrollment was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Log-rank tests were used to evaluate survival differences, and Cox regression models were applied to examine the independent association between travel distance and OS, adjusting for age, income, education, and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS). RESULTS At the time of submission, 92 patients were included, most of whom were white (98%) with a median KPS of 90 at enrollment. Median travel distance per visit was 85 miles. Travel distance was not significantly associated with OS in univariable (p = 0.14) or multivariable models (HR 1.0004, p = 0.12). In the univariable analysis, older age at progression (p = 0.00484), lower KPS at enrollment (p = 0.04641), and at the end of trial participation (p < 0.0001) were associated with worse OS. In multivariable analysis, distance per visit was not associated with OS (HR 1.0004, p = 0.12). Lower KPS at end of trial participation (HR 0.96, p < 0.0001) remained a strong predictor of worse OS. Education (HR 0.94, p = 0.058) showed borderline significance. CONCLUSION In this interim analysis, travel distance for clinical trial participation was not associated with survival in GBM. Additional data from recent years are being incorporated to strengthen our analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.0790
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DISP-30. Impact of distance traveled for clinical trial participation on clinical outcomes in patients with glioblastoma

L. Nicolas Gonzalez Castro, Tamar R. Berger, Keith Lloyd Ligon, John Yohan Rhee et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

DISP-30. Impact of distance traveled for clinical trial participation on clinical outcomes in patients with glioblastoma

L. Nicolas Gonzalez Castro, Tamar R. Berger, Keith Lloyd Ligon, John Yohan Rhee, Lakshmi Nayak, Gilbert Youssef, Matthew Auguste, Eudocia Q. Lee, Vihang Nakhate, Elisa Aquilanti, Rameen Beroukhim, Julien Rousseau, Ugonma Nnenna Chukwueke, Patrick Y Wen, David A. Reardon, Tracy T. Batchelor, Juan Pablo Ospina, Mary Jane Lim-Fat
article en

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Patients with glioblastoma (GBM) often face limited access to clinical trials, particularly those living in rural or underserved regions. We investigated whether travel distance for trial participation is associated with survival among these patients. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults with recurrent or progressive high-grade glioma enrolled in clinical trials at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute between 1999 and 2018. Travel distance from residence to Dana-Farber was estimated using ZIP codes, yielding the median distance per visit. Overall survival (OS) from trial enrollment was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Log-rank tests were used to evaluate survival differences, and Cox regression models were applied to examine the independent association between travel distance and OS, adjusting for age, income, education, and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS). RESULTS At the time of submission, 92 patients were included, most of whom were white (98%) with a median KPS of 90 at enrollment. Median travel distance per visit was 85 miles. Travel distance was not significantly associated with OS in univariable (p = 0.14) or multivariable models (HR 1.0004, p = 0.12). In the univariable analysis, older age at progression (p = 0.00484), lower KPS at enrollment (p = 0.04641), and at the end of trial participation (p < 0.0001) were associated with worse OS. In multivariable analysis, distance per visit was not associated with OS (HR 1.0004, p = 0.12). Lower KPS at end of trial participation (HR 0.96, p < 0.0001) remained a strong predictor of worse OS. Education (HR 0.94, p = 0.058) showed borderline significance. CONCLUSION In this interim analysis, travel distance for clinical trial participation was not associated with survival in GBM. Additional data from recent years are being incorporated to strengthen our analysis.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 27(Supplement_5)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA), Health Sciences Centre (CA), Center for Neuro-Oncology (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), University of Rochester (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.