BIOM-19. GENE EXPRESSION BIOMARKER PREDICTION OF BENEFIT FROM RE-IRRADIATION IN RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA

Abstract INTRODUCTION Radiotherapy improves overall survival (OS) in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (ndGBM). Re-irradiation (reRT) improves progression-free survival (PFS) when added to bevacizumab in recurrent GBM (rGBM), but an OS advantage in unselected populations has not been demonstrated. Here we test the hypothesis that gene expression profiling can predict OS benefit from reRT in rGBM. METHODS A retrospective cohort of 119 IDH-wildtype, CNS WHO grade 4 GBM tissue samples (n=61 ndGBM, n=58 rGBM) from 87 patients who underwent reRT at the time of any tumor recurrence was analyzed using a barcode-based RNA hybridization platform with a custom 291-gene panel representing pathways underlying GBM growth and therapeutic response. Univariate analyses identified 4 sets of 12-71 genes associated with OS. Ridge regression models (A-D) were trained using gene expression data to predict OS after reRT normalized to OS from diagnosis. Model outputs were mapped to reRT scores, which were dichotomized (high versus low) using maximally selected rank statistics. RESULTS Median time between RT courses was 19.9mo. Median OS after reRT was 10.2mo. Using gene expression from ndGBM, median OS after reRT for reRT score high versus low tumors was 11.9 versus 4.4mo (model A, p<0.0001), 68.2 versus 9.0mo (model B, p=0.0222), 11.7 versus 4.9mo (model C, p=0.0003), and 11.7 vs. 4.9mo (model D, p=0.0002). Using gene expression from rGBM, median OS after reRT for reRT score high versus low tumors was 15.0 versus 8.0mo (model A, p=0.0110), 16.7 versus 7.7mo (model B, p=0.0053), 16.8 versus 7.8mo (model C, p=0.0019), and 20.6 versus 10.2mo (model D, p=0.0242). ReRT score concordance across models was 0.939 (CI 0.887-0.97, p<0.001) and 0.97 (CI 0.949-0.983, p<0.001) for ndGBM versus rGBM. CONCLUSIONS Gene expression data from ndGBM or rGBM can stratify OS after reRT. The models reported here require validation in additional cohorts to determine predictive value.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.0107
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

BIOM-19. GENE EXPRESSION BIOMARKER PREDICTION OF BENEFIT FROM RE-IRRADIATION IN RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA

Jacob S. Young, David Ronan Raleigh, Nadeem Al-Adli, Minesh P. Mehta et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

BIOM-19. GENE EXPRESSION BIOMARKER PREDICTION OF BENEFIT FROM RE-IRRADIATION IN RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA

Jacob S. Young, David Ronan Raleigh, Nadeem Al-Adli, Minesh P. Mehta, Kanish Mirchia, Brooke C Braman, Akshara Vykunta, William C. Chen, Vivian Tang
article en

Abstract

Abstract INTRODUCTION Radiotherapy improves overall survival (OS) in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (ndGBM). Re-irradiation (reRT) improves progression-free survival (PFS) when added to bevacizumab in recurrent GBM (rGBM), but an OS advantage in unselected populations has not been demonstrated. Here we test the hypothesis that gene expression profiling can predict OS benefit from reRT in rGBM. METHODS A retrospective cohort of 119 IDH-wildtype, CNS WHO grade 4 GBM tissue samples (n=61 ndGBM, n=58 rGBM) from 87 patients who underwent reRT at the time of any tumor recurrence was analyzed using a barcode-based RNA hybridization platform with a custom 291-gene panel representing pathways underlying GBM growth and therapeutic response. Univariate analyses identified 4 sets of 12-71 genes associated with OS. Ridge regression models (A-D) were trained using gene expression data to predict OS after reRT normalized to OS from diagnosis. Model outputs were mapped to reRT scores, which were dichotomized (high versus low) using maximally selected rank statistics. RESULTS Median time between RT courses was 19.9mo. Median OS after reRT was 10.2mo. Using gene expression from ndGBM, median OS after reRT for reRT score high versus low tumors was 11.9 versus 4.4mo (model A, p<0.0001), 68.2 versus 9.0mo (model B, p=0.0222), 11.7 versus 4.9mo (model C, p=0.0003), and 11.7 vs. 4.9mo (model D, p=0.0002). Using gene expression from rGBM, median OS after reRT for reRT score high versus low tumors was 15.0 versus 8.0mo (model A, p=0.0110), 16.7 versus 7.7mo (model B, p=0.0053), 16.8 versus 7.8mo (model C, p=0.0019), and 20.6 versus 10.2mo (model D, p=0.0242). ReRT score concordance across models was 0.939 (CI 0.887-0.97, p<0.001) and 0.97 (CI 0.949-0.983, p<0.001) for ndGBM versus rGBM. CONCLUSIONS Gene expression data from ndGBM or rGBM can stratify OS after reRT. The models reported here require validation in additional cohorts to determine predictive value.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 27(Supplement_5)
University of California, San Francisco (US), Cancer Institute (WIA) (IN), Miami Heart Research Institute (US), NRG Oncology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.