INNV-18. Intraoperative Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases After Surgical ResectionA Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract BACKGROUND Brain metastases (BMs) are common in advanced cancers such as lung, breast, and melanoma, and carry a poor prognosis with high morbidity and local recurrence rates after surgery alone. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) has emerged as a promising adjuvant treatment, delivering radiation directly to the resection cavity to reduce recurrence and minimize delays to systemic therapy. However, evidence regarding its efficacy and safety compared to non-IORT approaches remains limited. METHODS This meta-analysis synthesized data from 16 studies (2006–2023) involving 966 patients undergoing surgical resection of brain metastases, comparing outcomes between IORT (n=616) and non-IORT (n=350) groups. Key outcomes assessed included local control, overall survival (OS), distant brain control (DBC), postoperative complications, and adverse events. Meta-regression was used to explore associations between clinical factors and outcomes. RESULTS IORT patients showed significantly lower postoperative complication rates compared to non-IORT patients (risk ratio 0.52, 95% CI 0.43–0.62, p<0.00001). The pooled local necrosis and postoperative mortality rates after IORT were low at 4.6% and 5.0%, respectively, with no significant differences related to radiation dose or duration. IORT was associated with shorter postoperative hospital stays (mean 8.8 vs. 19 days) and comparable or improved local recurrence rates. Meta-regression demonstrated a positive correlation between lesion size and mortality (p<0.05), emphasizing the importance of personalized treatment strategies. Distant brain control averaged 52.4%, with moderate-to-low risk of bias across studies. CONCLUSIONS IORT following surgical resection of brain metastases is a safe and effective modality, offering reduced postoperative complications and promising local control while enabling faster initiation of systemic therapy. Delivering adequate radiation doses tailored to tumor biology and size is critical to minimize local recurrence. Future clinical trials should focus on optimizing IORT parameters and establishing standardized guidelines to improve patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.0907
Primary Topic
Brain Metastases and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

INNV-18. Intraoperative Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases After Surgical ResectionA Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Ehab Shiban, Klaus-Henning Kahl, Amr Badary, Alireza Pandkhahi
Neuro-Oncology
Brain Metastases and Treatment
article

INNV-18. Intraoperative Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases After Surgical ResectionA Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Ehab Shiban, Klaus-Henning Kahl, Amr Badary, Alireza Pandkhahi
article en

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Brain metastases (BMs) are common in advanced cancers such as lung, breast, and melanoma, and carry a poor prognosis with high morbidity and local recurrence rates after surgery alone. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) has emerged as a promising adjuvant treatment, delivering radiation directly to the resection cavity to reduce recurrence and minimize delays to systemic therapy. However, evidence regarding its efficacy and safety compared to non-IORT approaches remains limited. METHODS This meta-analysis synthesized data from 16 studies (2006–2023) involving 966 patients undergoing surgical resection of brain metastases, comparing outcomes between IORT (n=616) and non-IORT (n=350) groups. Key outcomes assessed included local control, overall survival (OS), distant brain control (DBC), postoperative complications, and adverse events. Meta-regression was used to explore associations between clinical factors and outcomes. RESULTS IORT patients showed significantly lower postoperative complication rates compared to non-IORT patients (risk ratio 0.52, 95% CI 0.43–0.62, p<0.00001). The pooled local necrosis and postoperative mortality rates after IORT were low at 4.6% and 5.0%, respectively, with no significant differences related to radiation dose or duration. IORT was associated with shorter postoperative hospital stays (mean 8.8 vs. 19 days) and comparable or improved local recurrence rates. Meta-regression demonstrated a positive correlation between lesion size and mortality (p<0.05), emphasizing the importance of personalized treatment strategies. Distant brain control averaged 52.4%, with moderate-to-low risk of bias across studies. CONCLUSIONS IORT following surgical resection of brain metastases is a safe and effective modality, offering reduced postoperative complications and promising local control while enabling faster initiation of systemic therapy. Delivering adequate radiation doses tailored to tumor biology and size is critical to minimize local recurrence. Future clinical trials should focus on optimizing IORT parameters and establishing standardized guidelines to improve patient outcomes.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 27(Supplement_5)
Praxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie (DE), Onkologikoa (ES), Medizinische Universität Lausitz - Carl Thiem (DE), Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Brain Metastases and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.