DDDR-79. A novel, pooled, high-throughput screening of a CNS penetrant compound library identifies potential biomarker-driven therapeutics for glioblastoma

Abstract Identifying drug sensitivities that will translate to clinical practice for patients with glioblastoma (GBM) necessitates the use of a variety of cell models that recapitulate the heterogeneity of the disease. Screening of large drug libraries against numerous models is challenging due to both cost and complexity. We utilized a barcode-labeled, pooled system (CARPOOL) of a 23-member set of genomically characterized glioma spheroid cell (GSC) models to evaluate the in vitro response of a library of 728 brain-penetrant compounds. Responses were validated using individual, representative GSCs. The library included 164 drugs associated with oncologic applications, and almost two-thirds of the compounds have been or are currently in clinical development. A total of 450 (61.8%) showed response in at least a subset of models, with only 8 (1.8%) demonstrating broad vs. selective/differential response. Of the drugs previously unknown in oncology, 299 (53%) exhibited differential responses across the GSCs. Clustering compounds based on response across GSCs closely grouped those with shared mechanisms of action. Interestingly, potential, often novel, off-target responses were identified, including TIC10 (ONC201, dordaviprone) clustering with microtubule inhibitors, and an NPY1R inhibitor clustering with an MDM2-p53 inhibitor. Further genomic analyses identified specific associations with response, both previously known and novel, including RB1 mutation and alterations in response to CDK4/6 inhibitors. Interrogation of reverse phase protein array (RPPA) data from the GSCs identified associations between drug response and protein levels, such as Cyclin E1 levels with CDK4/6 response, and phosphorylated c-Raf with histone deacetylase inhibitor response. Furthermore, select compounds were tested in combination with radiotherapy to identify potential radiosensitizers that could enhance therapeutic synergy. Our study presents a novel approach for advancing drug discovery for rapid preclinical evaluation and identifies not only responding subsets but also potential selective, molecular biomarkers for downstream incorporation into clinical trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.0716
Primary Topic
Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DDDR-79. A novel, pooled, high-throughput screening of a CNS penetrant compound library identifies potential biomarker-driven therapeutics for glioblastoma

Ravesanker Ezhilarasan, Aram S. Modrek, Graysen McManus, Erik P. Sulman et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
article

DDDR-79. A novel, pooled, high-throughput screening of a CNS penetrant compound library identifies potential biomarker-driven therapeutics for glioblastoma

Ravesanker Ezhilarasan, Aram S. Modrek, Graysen McManus, Erik P. Sulman, Jerome M. Karp, Yingwen Ding, Ananya Jambhale, Ze-Yan Zhang, Melanie Graciani
article en

Abstract

Abstract Identifying drug sensitivities that will translate to clinical practice for patients with glioblastoma (GBM) necessitates the use of a variety of cell models that recapitulate the heterogeneity of the disease. Screening of large drug libraries against numerous models is challenging due to both cost and complexity. We utilized a barcode-labeled, pooled system (CARPOOL) of a 23-member set of genomically characterized glioma spheroid cell (GSC) models to evaluate the in vitro response of a library of 728 brain-penetrant compounds. Responses were validated using individual, representative GSCs. The library included 164 drugs associated with oncologic applications, and almost two-thirds of the compounds have been or are currently in clinical development. A total of 450 (61.8%) showed response in at least a subset of models, with only 8 (1.8%) demonstrating broad vs. selective/differential response. Of the drugs previously unknown in oncology, 299 (53%) exhibited differential responses across the GSCs. Clustering compounds based on response across GSCs closely grouped those with shared mechanisms of action. Interestingly, potential, often novel, off-target responses were identified, including TIC10 (ONC201, dordaviprone) clustering with microtubule inhibitors, and an NPY1R inhibitor clustering with an MDM2-p53 inhibitor. Further genomic analyses identified specific associations with response, both previously known and novel, including RB1 mutation and alterations in response to CDK4/6 inhibitors. Interrogation of reverse phase protein array (RPPA) data from the GSCs identified associations between drug response and protein levels, such as Cyclin E1 levels with CDK4/6 response, and phosphorylated c-Raf with histone deacetylase inhibitor response. Furthermore, select compounds were tested in combination with radiotherapy to identify potential radiosensitizers that could enhance therapeutic synergy. Our study presents a novel approach for advancing drug discovery for rapid preclinical evaluation and identifies not only responding subsets but also potential selective, molecular biomarkers for downstream incorporation into clinical trials.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 27(Supplement_5)
Nanchang University (CN), Duke University (US), Sheba Medical Center (IL), Keck Hospital of USC (US), First Affiliated Hospital of Jiangxi Medical College (CN), New York University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.