CTNI-26. RESULTS OF A MULTICENTER PHASE 2 BASKET TRIAL EVALUATING THE EFFICACY OF TASURGRATINIB (E7090) IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED SOLID TUMORS WITH FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR (FGFR) GENE ALTERATION, INCLUDING THOSE WITH PRIMARY BRAIN TUMORS: F

Abstract BACKGROUND Tasurgratinib is an orally available selective FGFR1-3 tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved in Japan for biliary tract cancer with FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements. We previously identified highly sensitive FGFR mutations to tasurgratinib using a high-throughput functional evaluation method (MANO method). We conducted a multicenter, single-arm investigator-initiated phase 2 basket trial to evaluate tasurgratinib in patients (pts) with FGFR alterations. METHODS Pts with advanced solid tumors including brain tumors with FGFR gene alterations received tasurgratinib 140 mg QD. Pts were assigned to each group (Group A: FGFR1-3 fusion, Group B: FGFR1-3 mutation sensitive to tasurgratinib by MANO methods, Group C: FGFR1-3 activating mutation not in Group B or FGFR1/2 amplification, Group D: cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 fusion pretreated with other FGFR inhibitors). The primary endpoint for Groups A-C was objective response rate (ORR) by independent central review (ICR); Group D was exploratory cohort. Secondary endpoints included ORR by investigator assessment (IA), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety. The threshold and expected response rates were 5% and 30%. Target enrollment for Group A, B, C and D were 10 pts, 15 pts, 15 pts and 1-5 pts, respectively. RESULTS From June 2021 to December 2023, 46 pts enrolled and 41 comprised the full analysis set (A:10, B:15, C:15, D:1). Most common primary sites in each group were brain (A), biliary tract (B), and esophagus/stomach (C). ORRs by ICR were: A: 20.0% (90% CI 3.7-50.7, p=0.0861), B: 20.0% (90% CI 5.7-44.0, p=0.0362), and C: 6.7% (90% CI 0.3-27.9, p=0.5367). ORRs by IA were: A: 20.0%, B: 40.0%, C: 13.3%, D: 0.0%. Median PFSs by IA were A: 2.5, B: 7.2, C: 2.2, D: 5.7 months. CONCLUSIONS Primary endpoint was met in Group B. Tasurgratinib demonstrated clinical activity in pts with selected FGFR-mutated tumors. Additional recruitment of pts has been resumed (jRCT2031210043).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.0523
Primary Topic
Fibroblast Growth Factor Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CTNI-26. RESULTS OF A MULTICENTER PHASE 2 BASKET TRIAL EVALUATING THE EFFICACY OF TASURGRATINIB (E7090) IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED SOLID TUMORS WITH FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR (FGFR) GENE ALTERATION, INCLUDING THOSE WITH PRIMARY BRAIN TUMORS: F

Kazumi Kurishita, Ryo Sadachi, Hitomi Sumiyoshi Okuma, Kan Yonemori et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Fibroblast Growth Factor Research
article

CTNI-26. RESULTS OF A MULTICENTER PHASE 2 BASKET TRIAL EVALUATING THE EFFICACY OF TASURGRATINIB (E7090) IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED SOLID TUMORS WITH FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR (FGFR) GENE ALTERATION, INCLUDING THOSE WITH PRIMARY BRAIN TUMORS: F

Kazumi Kurishita, Ryo Sadachi, Hitomi Sumiyoshi Okuma, Kan Yonemori, Ichiro Kinoshita, Masanobu Takahashi, Shinji Kohsaka, Yohei Chiba, Kazuki Sudo, Ryunosuke Machida, Masamichi Takahashi, Kenta Anjo, Kenichi Nakamura, Junichi Matsubara, Masahiko Ichimura, K Tsuchihashi
article en

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Tasurgratinib is an orally available selective FGFR1-3 tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved in Japan for biliary tract cancer with FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements. We previously identified highly sensitive FGFR mutations to tasurgratinib using a high-throughput functional evaluation method (MANO method). We conducted a multicenter, single-arm investigator-initiated phase 2 basket trial to evaluate tasurgratinib in patients (pts) with FGFR alterations. METHODS Pts with advanced solid tumors including brain tumors with FGFR gene alterations received tasurgratinib 140 mg QD. Pts were assigned to each group (Group A: FGFR1-3 fusion, Group B: FGFR1-3 mutation sensitive to tasurgratinib by MANO methods, Group C: FGFR1-3 activating mutation not in Group B or FGFR1/2 amplification, Group D: cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 fusion pretreated with other FGFR inhibitors). The primary endpoint for Groups A-C was objective response rate (ORR) by independent central review (ICR); Group D was exploratory cohort. Secondary endpoints included ORR by investigator assessment (IA), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety. The threshold and expected response rates were 5% and 30%. Target enrollment for Group A, B, C and D were 10 pts, 15 pts, 15 pts and 1-5 pts, respectively. RESULTS From June 2021 to December 2023, 46 pts enrolled and 41 comprised the full analysis set (A:10, B:15, C:15, D:1). Most common primary sites in each group were brain (A), biliary tract (B), and esophagus/stomach (C). ORRs by ICR were: A: 20.0% (90% CI 3.7-50.7, p=0.0861), B: 20.0% (90% CI 5.7-44.0, p=0.0362), and C: 6.7% (90% CI 0.3-27.9, p=0.5367). ORRs by IA were: A: 20.0%, B: 40.0%, C: 13.3%, D: 0.0%. Median PFSs by IA were A: 2.5, B: 7.2, C: 2.2, D: 5.7 months. CONCLUSIONS Primary endpoint was met in Group B. Tasurgratinib demonstrated clinical activity in pts with selected FGFR-mutated tumors. Additional recruitment of pts has been resumed (jRCT2031210043).

Neuro-OncologyVol. 27(Supplement_5)
Tokai University (JP), National Cancer Center (US), Tohoku University Hospital (JP), Kyushu University Hospital (JP), Tokai University Hospital (JP), Sapporo Medical University Hospital (JP), Hokkaido University Hospital (JP), National Cancer Center Hospital East (JP), Kyoto University Hospital (JP), Japan Clinical Cancer Research Organization (JP), Tokyo National Hospital (JP), National Cancer Research Institute (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Fibroblast Growth Factor Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.