RADT-76. SURVIVAL DISADVANTAGE WITH BETA-BLOCKER USE IN MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES

Abstract BACKGROUND Recent observational studies increasingly support the off-label use of β-blockers (BB) as adjuvant therapy that may enhance survival in cancer patients. However, their effect on survival and intracranial progression in melanoma brain metastases (MBM) remains unclear. This study evaluates the association between BB use and outcomes in MBM patients treated with immunotherapy and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery (GKRS). METHODS This retrospective study includes 234 patients with MBM treated between 2011 and 2024. Among them, 146 were on concomitant BB therapy. To address baseline differences, we performed two 1:1 propensity score matchings: Cohort 1 - any BB vs no BB (n = 172) - and Cohort 2 - non-selective BB vs no BB (n = 32). Outcomes included overall survival (OS), local progression (LP), and distant brain metastasis failure (DBMF). Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were utilized. RESULTS There were no significant differences in baseline demographics or treatment parameters among the matched cohorts. In the unmatched cohort, patients not taking BB had higher median OS at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months (66%, 52%, 50%, and 45%, respectively), compared to the BB group (52%, 46%, 42%, and 38%, respectively). In Cohort 1, median OS was lower in BB users but did not show significance (p = 0.45). BB users, however, had a significantly shorter median time to DBMF compared to non-users (5.4 vs 13.2 months; p = 0.0055). In Cohort 2, non-selective BB use did not significantly impact LP (p = 0.64) or median time to DBMF (p=0.27). CONCLUSIONS Although BB use did not impact OS or LP, it was associated with decreased time to distant metastasis failure after propensity score matching. These findings suggest a potential adverse association with intracranial disease control. Prospective studies are warranted to elucidate these interactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.0445
Primary Topic
Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RADT-76. SURVIVAL DISADVANTAGE WITH BETA-BLOCKER USE IN MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES

Douglas Kondziolka, Monica Mureb, Arnaldo Moura Neto, Allen Ye Fu et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
article

RADT-76. SURVIVAL DISADVANTAGE WITH BETA-BLOCKER USE IN MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES

Douglas Kondziolka, Monica Mureb, Arnaldo Moura Neto, Allen Ye Fu, Kenneth E. Bernstein
article en

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Recent observational studies increasingly support the off-label use of β-blockers (BB) as adjuvant therapy that may enhance survival in cancer patients. However, their effect on survival and intracranial progression in melanoma brain metastases (MBM) remains unclear. This study evaluates the association between BB use and outcomes in MBM patients treated with immunotherapy and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery (GKRS). METHODS This retrospective study includes 234 patients with MBM treated between 2011 and 2024. Among them, 146 were on concomitant BB therapy. To address baseline differences, we performed two 1:1 propensity score matchings: Cohort 1 - any BB vs no BB (n = 172) - and Cohort 2 - non-selective BB vs no BB (n = 32). Outcomes included overall survival (OS), local progression (LP), and distant brain metastasis failure (DBMF). Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were utilized. RESULTS There were no significant differences in baseline demographics or treatment parameters among the matched cohorts. In the unmatched cohort, patients not taking BB had higher median OS at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months (66%, 52%, 50%, and 45%, respectively), compared to the BB group (52%, 46%, 42%, and 38%, respectively). In Cohort 1, median OS was lower in BB users but did not show significance (p = 0.45). BB users, however, had a significantly shorter median time to DBMF compared to non-users (5.4 vs 13.2 months; p = 0.0055). In Cohort 2, non-selective BB use did not significantly impact LP (p = 0.64) or median time to DBMF (p=0.27). CONCLUSIONS Although BB use did not impact OS or LP, it was associated with decreased time to distant metastasis failure after propensity score matching. These findings suggest a potential adverse association with intracranial disease control. Prospective studies are warranted to elucidate these interactions.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 27(Supplement_5)
NYU Langone Health (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.