Facial esthetic perception between skeletal Class III patients treated with conventional and surgery-first orthognathic approaches

In this study, we indicate that the choice of orthognathic surgical protocol, whether surgery-first or conventional, did not significantly influence the perceived facial profile attractiveness of skeletal Class III patients. These findings support the clinical viability of the SFA protocol, particularly in cases where treatment time or patient preference are factors in decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Angle Orthodontist
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2319/010125-4.1
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Facial esthetic perception between skeletal Class III patients treated with conventional and surgery-first orthognathic approaches

Arthur Cunha, José Augusto M. Miguel, Jorge Faber, Flávia Artese et al.
The Angle Orthodontist
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Facial esthetic perception between skeletal Class III patients treated with conventional and surgery-first orthognathic approaches

Arthur Cunha, José Augusto M. Miguel, Jorge Faber, Flávia Artese, Tânia Manso
article en

Abstract

In this study, we indicate that the choice of orthognathic surgical protocol, whether surgery-first or conventional, did not significantly influence the perceived facial profile attractiveness of skeletal Class III patients. These findings support the clinical viability of the SFA protocol, particularly in cases where treatment time or patient preference are factors in decision-making.

The Angle OrthodontistVol. 96(2)
Universidade de Brasília (BR), Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.