IMG-95. TTFields compliance reflects lower cellular tumor burden within contrast enhancement and FLAIR hyperintensity in glioblastoma patients

Abstract Tumor treating fields (TTFields) are a treatment available for recurrent glioblastoma (GBM), utilizing four transducer arrays placed on the scalp that produce alternating electric fields to disrupt cell division. We have a published machine learning algorithm that uses MRI data and autopsy tissue to generate radio-pathomic maps (RPMs) of cell density and tumor probability. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that GBM patients treated with TTFields therapy would have lower cell density and tumor probability within contrast enhancement (CE) and FLAIR hyperintensity (FH) compared to TTFields-naïve patients. 59 GBM patients from the MCW Neuro-oncology Brain Bank were split into three groups: eligible TTFields users (≥75% compliance for ≥90 days, n=17), low-usage TTFields users (<75% compliance or <90 days, n=21), and controls (no TTFields treatment, n=21). For each patient’s final MRI, RPMs were generated using T1, T1C, FLAIR, and ADC as input, and masks of CE and FH were annotated on the T1C and FLAIR. Two-tailed t-tests were used to compare average cell density and tumor probability within these masks between groups. Eligible TTFields patients showed significantly lower cell density (p=0.012) and tumor probability (p=0.002) within FH as well as significantly lower cell density within CE (p=0.012) compared to controls in the MRI scan closest to death. Low-usage TTFields patients showed significantly lower tumor probability within FH (p=0.027) compared to controls. These findings demonstrate that compliant TTFields treatment is associated with reduced cell density and tumor probability within both enhancing and non-enhancing tumor regions. Partial compliance or short-term use may harbor some treatment benefit, as even low-usage patients had reduced tumor probability within FH. However, full compliance resulted in patients demonstrating this effect, along with significantly reduced cell density in both CE and FH. Additionally, this result highlights the potential for treatment response assessment using radio-pathomic mapping in non-enhancing tumor margins.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.1174
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IMG-95. TTFields compliance reflects lower cellular tumor burden within contrast enhancement and FLAIR hyperintensity in glioblastoma patients

Fitzgerald Kyereme, Max Krucoff, Biprojit Nath, Kelly Mrachek et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

IMG-95. TTFields compliance reflects lower cellular tumor burden within contrast enhancement and FLAIR hyperintensity in glioblastoma patients

Fitzgerald Kyereme, Max Krucoff, Biprojit Nath, Kelly Mrachek, Bo H. Chao, Aleksandra Winiarz, Peter S. LaViolette, Samuel Bobholz, Savannah Duenweg, Allison K. Lowman, Jennifer Connelly
article en

Abstract

Abstract Tumor treating fields (TTFields) are a treatment available for recurrent glioblastoma (GBM), utilizing four transducer arrays placed on the scalp that produce alternating electric fields to disrupt cell division. We have a published machine learning algorithm that uses MRI data and autopsy tissue to generate radio-pathomic maps (RPMs) of cell density and tumor probability. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that GBM patients treated with TTFields therapy would have lower cell density and tumor probability within contrast enhancement (CE) and FLAIR hyperintensity (FH) compared to TTFields-naïve patients. 59 GBM patients from the MCW Neuro-oncology Brain Bank were split into three groups: eligible TTFields users (≥75% compliance for ≥90 days, n=17), low-usage TTFields users (<75% compliance or <90 days, n=21), and controls (no TTFields treatment, n=21). For each patient’s final MRI, RPMs were generated using T1, T1C, FLAIR, and ADC as input, and masks of CE and FH were annotated on the T1C and FLAIR. Two-tailed t-tests were used to compare average cell density and tumor probability within these masks between groups. Eligible TTFields patients showed significantly lower cell density (p=0.012) and tumor probability (p=0.002) within FH as well as significantly lower cell density within CE (p=0.012) compared to controls in the MRI scan closest to death. Low-usage TTFields patients showed significantly lower tumor probability within FH (p=0.027) compared to controls. These findings demonstrate that compliant TTFields treatment is associated with reduced cell density and tumor probability within both enhancing and non-enhancing tumor regions. Partial compliance or short-term use may harbor some treatment benefit, as even low-usage patients had reduced tumor probability within FH. However, full compliance resulted in patients demonstrating this effect, along with significantly reduced cell density in both CE and FH. Additionally, this result highlights the potential for treatment response assessment using radio-pathomic mapping in non-enhancing tumor margins.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 27(Supplement_5)
Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.