EPID-09. Delayed surgical intervention in low-grade gliomas: an analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) and the National Cancer Database (NCDB)

Abstract INTRODUCTION Despite evidence supporting the benefit of early surgical treatment of low-grade gliomas, the “watchful waiting” approach remains commonly practiced. Here, we examined the real-world pattern of surgical recommendations on early versus delayed surgical biopsies for low-grade gliomas. METHODS Low-grade astrocytoma, anaplastic astrocytoma, and glioblastoma patients who underwent biopsies for histologic diagnosis were identified in the NCDB (2010-2021) and SEER (2004-2019). The early biopsy (EB) cohort was defined as patients receiving a recommendation for biopsy on initial presentation. Patients receiving initial recommendations against surgery were placed in the “watchful waiting”/delayed biopsy (DB) cohort. Demographic, clinical characteristics, and survival outcomes of these cohorts were compared. RESULTS In both the NCDB and the SEER, low-grade gliomas were more likely to receive a DB recommendation than glioblastoma patients after adjusting pertinent covariates. (NCDB: aOR=1.88, p<0.001; SEER: aOR=1.77, p<0.001). Interestingly, anaplastic astrocytoma patients were also more likely to receive DB recommendations than glioblastoma patients (NCDB: aOR=1.97, p<0.001; SEER: aOR=1.78, p<0.001). Variables associated with DB for low-grade glioma and anaplastic astrocytoma patients included: advanced age, deep cortical/infratentorial location, and smaller tumor size. In the NCDB, these findings remain robust after accounting for dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status, which was available in the NCDB after 2018. In a multivariable model accounting for survival-pertinent variables, including age, tumor location, and tumor size, DB patients showed a higher hazard ratio of death relative to EB patients. For low-grade glioma patients, the aHR=1.23 (p=0.006) for NCDB and aHR=1.15 (p=0.039) for SEER. For anaplastic astrocytoma patients, the aHR=1.44, p<0.001 for the NCDB and aHR=1.53, p<0.001 for the SEER. CONCLUSIONS Patients with low-grade or anaplastic astrocytoma are nearly twice as likely to receive a recommendation for “watchful waiting”/delayed biopsy. This practice should be considered in light of the clinical availability of IDH inhibitors and surgical technologies that improve the safety of stereotactic needle biopsies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.0741
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EPID-09. Delayed surgical intervention in low-grade gliomas: an analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) and the National Cancer Database (NCDB)

Christopher Chang, Clark Chen, Ping Zhu
Neuro-Oncology
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

EPID-09. Delayed surgical intervention in low-grade gliomas: an analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) and the National Cancer Database (NCDB)

Christopher Chang, Clark Chen, Ping Zhu
article en

Abstract

Abstract INTRODUCTION Despite evidence supporting the benefit of early surgical treatment of low-grade gliomas, the “watchful waiting” approach remains commonly practiced. Here, we examined the real-world pattern of surgical recommendations on early versus delayed surgical biopsies for low-grade gliomas. METHODS Low-grade astrocytoma, anaplastic astrocytoma, and glioblastoma patients who underwent biopsies for histologic diagnosis were identified in the NCDB (2010-2021) and SEER (2004-2019). The early biopsy (EB) cohort was defined as patients receiving a recommendation for biopsy on initial presentation. Patients receiving initial recommendations against surgery were placed in the “watchful waiting”/delayed biopsy (DB) cohort. Demographic, clinical characteristics, and survival outcomes of these cohorts were compared. RESULTS In both the NCDB and the SEER, low-grade gliomas were more likely to receive a DB recommendation than glioblastoma patients after adjusting pertinent covariates. (NCDB: aOR=1.88, p<0.001; SEER: aOR=1.77, p<0.001). Interestingly, anaplastic astrocytoma patients were also more likely to receive DB recommendations than glioblastoma patients (NCDB: aOR=1.97, p<0.001; SEER: aOR=1.78, p<0.001). Variables associated with DB for low-grade glioma and anaplastic astrocytoma patients included: advanced age, deep cortical/infratentorial location, and smaller tumor size. In the NCDB, these findings remain robust after accounting for dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status, which was available in the NCDB after 2018. In a multivariable model accounting for survival-pertinent variables, including age, tumor location, and tumor size, DB patients showed a higher hazard ratio of death relative to EB patients. For low-grade glioma patients, the aHR=1.23 (p=0.006) for NCDB and aHR=1.15 (p=0.039) for SEER. For anaplastic astrocytoma patients, the aHR=1.44, p<0.001 for the NCDB and aHR=1.53, p<0.001 for the SEER. CONCLUSIONS Patients with low-grade or anaplastic astrocytoma are nearly twice as likely to receive a recommendation for “watchful waiting”/delayed biopsy. This practice should be considered in light of the clinical availability of IDH inhibitors and surgical technologies that improve the safety of stereotactic needle biopsies.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 27(Supplement_5)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Brown University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.