INNV-39. Response to next interventions after treatment with off-label ivosidenib in patients with mutant IDH low grade glioma

Abstract The introduction of mutant IDH inhibitors (mIDHi) has transformed the treatment landscape for patients with low-grade gliomas (LGG). However, optimal strategies for tumor control following progression on mIDHi therapy remain uncertain. We describe outcomes of next-line interventions in a real-world cohort of patients with mutant IDH (mIDH) LGG who progressed on ivosidenib. Out of a cohort of 74 patients with mIDH LGG treated with ivosidenib monotherapy at a single center, eight were identified who experienced radiographic progression per RANO criteria and subsequently received next-line therapy between October 2020 and June 2025. Clinical characteristics and imaging findings, including volumetric tumor assessments, were analyzed. In this cohort (n=8), patients were 24–58 years old at ivosidenib initiation. Diagnoses included WHO grade 2 astrocytoma (n=4) and oligodendroglioma (n=4). Prior therapies included maximal safe resection (n=7), temozolomide (n=5), and lomustine (n=1); none had received prior radiation therapy (RT). Time to progression on ivosidenib ranged from 2 to 42 months. Next interventions included lomustine monotherapy (n=2), RT with concurrent temozolomide (n=4), RT alone (n=1), and re-resection followed by chemoradiation (n=1). Following next line therapy, five patients demonstrated radiographic improvement, two had stable disease, and one had changes attributed to post-treatment effect. Volumetric studies within 6 months before and after progression on ivosidenib showed an average tumor growth of +5.2±3.2% per month prior to progression and shrinkage of -13.1±3.9% per month following next-line intervention. Median follow-up after progression was 15±11 months. At last follow-up, six patients had tumor control without clinical or radiographic worsening. Two patients experienced disease progression, both of whom had high-risk features, including absence of prior resection, tumor transformation to higher grade, neurologic exam decline, and poor chemotherapy tolerance. In this early real-world cohort, most patients with mIDH LGG achieved clinical and radiographic stability after progression on ivosidenib using next-line chemotherapy and RT. These findings support the feasibility of cytotoxic strategies following mIDH inhibition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.0928
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

INNV-39. Response to next interventions after treatment with off-label ivosidenib in patients with mutant IDH low grade glioma

Annick Desjardins, Mustafa Khasraw, Kristen A. Batich, Justin Low et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

INNV-39. Response to next interventions after treatment with off-label ivosidenib in patients with mutant IDH low grade glioma

Annick Desjardins, Mustafa Khasraw, Kristen A. Batich, Justin Low, Margaret Johnson, Evan Calabrese, Rana Elkholi, Katherine Peters, David M. Ashley, Mallika Patel, Madison L Shoaf, Maria Minor, Jikai Zhang, Alicia Savelli, Henry S. Friedman, John Dewey
article en

Abstract

Abstract The introduction of mutant IDH inhibitors (mIDHi) has transformed the treatment landscape for patients with low-grade gliomas (LGG). However, optimal strategies for tumor control following progression on mIDHi therapy remain uncertain. We describe outcomes of next-line interventions in a real-world cohort of patients with mutant IDH (mIDH) LGG who progressed on ivosidenib. Out of a cohort of 74 patients with mIDH LGG treated with ivosidenib monotherapy at a single center, eight were identified who experienced radiographic progression per RANO criteria and subsequently received next-line therapy between October 2020 and June 2025. Clinical characteristics and imaging findings, including volumetric tumor assessments, were analyzed. In this cohort (n=8), patients were 24–58 years old at ivosidenib initiation. Diagnoses included WHO grade 2 astrocytoma (n=4) and oligodendroglioma (n=4). Prior therapies included maximal safe resection (n=7), temozolomide (n=5), and lomustine (n=1); none had received prior radiation therapy (RT). Time to progression on ivosidenib ranged from 2 to 42 months. Next interventions included lomustine monotherapy (n=2), RT with concurrent temozolomide (n=4), RT alone (n=1), and re-resection followed by chemoradiation (n=1). Following next line therapy, five patients demonstrated radiographic improvement, two had stable disease, and one had changes attributed to post-treatment effect. Volumetric studies within 6 months before and after progression on ivosidenib showed an average tumor growth of +5.2±3.2% per month prior to progression and shrinkage of -13.1±3.9% per month following next-line intervention. Median follow-up after progression was 15±11 months. At last follow-up, six patients had tumor control without clinical or radiographic worsening. Two patients experienced disease progression, both of whom had high-risk features, including absence of prior resection, tumor transformation to higher grade, neurologic exam decline, and poor chemotherapy tolerance. In this early real-world cohort, most patients with mIDH LGG achieved clinical and radiographic stability after progression on ivosidenib using next-line chemotherapy and RT. These findings support the feasibility of cytotoxic strategies following mIDH inhibition.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 27(Supplement_5)
Duke University (US), Servier (France) (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.