QOL-20. Subjective cognition and its predictors: Exploring distress and routine in brain cancer

Abstract BACKGROUND A brain tumor (BT) diagnosis can lead to psychological distress, subjective cognitive decline, and disruption of daily routines due to symptoms, treatment, and changes in role functioning (e.g., job loss, driving limitations). While distress is a well-established correlate of subjective cognitive complaints in this population, the role of routine disruption remains understudied. This study examines whether changes in daily routine predict subjective cognition above and beyond distress. METHOD A cross-sectional survey of 137 BT patients assessed subjective cognitive functioning (FACT-Br-CI), psychological distress, and daily routine regularity. Participants rated the degree to which they experienced distress from common BT-related symptoms (e.g., mood changes, fatigue, fine motor impairments, balance difficulties, relationship changes, and physical symptoms) on a 5-point scale. Perceived regularity of daily routines was rated separately for pre- and post-diagnosis on a 4-point scale. RESULTS A paired-samples t-test revealed a significant decline in routine regularity following diagnosis, t(133) = 6.44, p <.001, d = 0.56. A difference score (post-diagnosis minus pre-diagnosis) was calculated to represent change in routine, with negative values reflecting increased irregularity and positive values reflecting greater regularity. In a hierarchical regression predicting subjective cognition, distress was a significant predictor in the initial model (β = -0.36, p <.001, R² =.13). Adding routine change significantly improved the model (ΔR² =.031, F change = 4.31, p =.040), with the final model explaining 16% of the variance (F(2, 117) = 11.38, p <.001, R² =.16). Greater routine irregularity was associated with poorer subjective cognition (β = 0.18, p =.040), independent of distress levels. CONCLUSION Routine regularity may play a meaningful role in subjective cognitive outcomes among BT patients. Future research should explore these relationships longitudinally and examine interventions that promote daily structure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.1521
Primary Topic
Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

QOL-20. Subjective cognition and its predictors: Exploring distress and routine in brain cancer

Sarah Braun, Brennan R. Payne, Autumn Lanoye, Ashlee R. Loughan et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
article

QOL-20. Subjective cognition and its predictors: Exploring distress and routine in brain cancer

Sarah Braun, Brennan R. Payne, Autumn Lanoye, Ashlee R. Loughan, Morgan Reid
article en

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND A brain tumor (BT) diagnosis can lead to psychological distress, subjective cognitive decline, and disruption of daily routines due to symptoms, treatment, and changes in role functioning (e.g., job loss, driving limitations). While distress is a well-established correlate of subjective cognitive complaints in this population, the role of routine disruption remains understudied. This study examines whether changes in daily routine predict subjective cognition above and beyond distress. METHOD A cross-sectional survey of 137 BT patients assessed subjective cognitive functioning (FACT-Br-CI), psychological distress, and daily routine regularity. Participants rated the degree to which they experienced distress from common BT-related symptoms (e.g., mood changes, fatigue, fine motor impairments, balance difficulties, relationship changes, and physical symptoms) on a 5-point scale. Perceived regularity of daily routines was rated separately for pre- and post-diagnosis on a 4-point scale. RESULTS A paired-samples t-test revealed a significant decline in routine regularity following diagnosis, t(133) = 6.44, p <.001, d = 0.56. A difference score (post-diagnosis minus pre-diagnosis) was calculated to represent change in routine, with negative values reflecting increased irregularity and positive values reflecting greater regularity. In a hierarchical regression predicting subjective cognition, distress was a significant predictor in the initial model (β = -0.36, p <.001, R² =.13). Adding routine change significantly improved the model (ΔR² =.031, F change = 4.31, p =.040), with the final model explaining 16% of the variance (F(2, 117) = 11.38, p <.001, R² =.16). Greater routine irregularity was associated with poorer subjective cognition (β = 0.18, p =.040), independent of distress levels. CONCLUSION Routine regularity may play a meaningful role in subjective cognitive outcomes among BT patients. Future research should explore these relationships longitudinally and examine interventions that promote daily structure.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 27(Supplement_5)
Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.