QOL-13. Facing the Future: Prognostic awareness and its relationship with psychological distress in neuro-oncology patients

Abstract BACKGROUND Prognostic awareness (PA)—insight regarding disease incurability, and related emotional and adaptive coping—is associated with reduced psychological distress in patients with advanced cancer; however, this relationship is largely unexplored in neuro-oncology. We aim to 1) describe the PA profile, 2) examine associations between PA and psychological distress, and 3) assess differences in psychological distress by PA accuracy in a neuro-oncology sample. METHODS This secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial examining Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully included 58 adults (Mage=51.97, SD=10.39) with primary brain tumor (PBT, n=30) or brain metastases (bMETs, n=28) and heightened depression (PHQ-9≥10) or death-anxiety (DADDS≥15) who completed a measure of baseline PA (PAIS). Analyses included descriptive statistics (means, standard deviations, frequencies), Pearson’s correlations examining relationships between PA and psychological distress, and independent samples t-tests comparing differences in psychological distress between those with-and-without accurate PA (i.e., acknowledgement that their oncologist said the cancer is incurable). RESULTS Patients reported mild symptoms of depression (M=9.77, SD=5.42) and moderate death-anxiety (M=34.75, SD=13.47). Forty-four (76%) participants demonstrated accurate PA. However, 91% of those with accurate PA believed that they were ‘very likely’ to be cured. Item-level for emotional and adaptive coping will be discussed. Better emotional coping was associated with increased death-anxiety (r=.485), but not depression (ps>.05). Adaptive coping was not associated with psychological distress (ps>.05). Psychological distress did not differ between accurate versus inaccurate PA (ps>.05). Patients with accurate PA exhibited better emotional coping (M=15.35, SD=5.34) than those who were inaccurate (M=10.18, SD=4.94), t(56)=-3.36, p=.001). CONCLUSION Results suggest neuro-oncology patients may be overly optimistic about the curability of their disease, despite accurate PA. Further, accurate PA may promote emotional coping in neuro-oncology patients but at the cost of psychological distress, underscoring the need for supportive interventions for patients navigating the emotional challenges of confronting a terminal diagnosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.1514
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

QOL-13. Facing the Future: Prognostic awareness and its relationship with psychological distress in neuro-oncology patients

Giuliana Zarrella, Christopher Kleva, Amber M Fox, Autumn Lanoye et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Cancer survivorship and care
article

QOL-13. Facing the Future: Prognostic awareness and its relationship with psychological distress in neuro-oncology patients

Giuliana Zarrella, Christopher Kleva, Amber M Fox, Autumn Lanoye, Ashlee R. Loughan
article en

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Prognostic awareness (PA)—insight regarding disease incurability, and related emotional and adaptive coping—is associated with reduced psychological distress in patients with advanced cancer; however, this relationship is largely unexplored in neuro-oncology. We aim to 1) describe the PA profile, 2) examine associations between PA and psychological distress, and 3) assess differences in psychological distress by PA accuracy in a neuro-oncology sample. METHODS This secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial examining Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully included 58 adults (Mage=51.97, SD=10.39) with primary brain tumor (PBT, n=30) or brain metastases (bMETs, n=28) and heightened depression (PHQ-9≥10) or death-anxiety (DADDS≥15) who completed a measure of baseline PA (PAIS). Analyses included descriptive statistics (means, standard deviations, frequencies), Pearson’s correlations examining relationships between PA and psychological distress, and independent samples t-tests comparing differences in psychological distress between those with-and-without accurate PA (i.e., acknowledgement that their oncologist said the cancer is incurable). RESULTS Patients reported mild symptoms of depression (M=9.77, SD=5.42) and moderate death-anxiety (M=34.75, SD=13.47). Forty-four (76%) participants demonstrated accurate PA. However, 91% of those with accurate PA believed that they were ‘very likely’ to be cured. Item-level for emotional and adaptive coping will be discussed. Better emotional coping was associated with increased death-anxiety (r=.485), but not depression (ps>.05). Adaptive coping was not associated with psychological distress (ps>.05). Psychological distress did not differ between accurate versus inaccurate PA (ps>.05). Patients with accurate PA exhibited better emotional coping (M=15.35, SD=5.34) than those who were inaccurate (M=10.18, SD=4.94), t(56)=-3.36, p=.001). CONCLUSION Results suggest neuro-oncology patients may be overly optimistic about the curability of their disease, despite accurate PA. Further, accurate PA may promote emotional coping in neuro-oncology patients but at the cost of psychological distress, underscoring the need for supportive interventions for patients navigating the emotional challenges of confronting a terminal diagnosis.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 27(Supplement_5)
Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.