QLTI-26. Analysis of initial treatment patterns for pediatric central nervous system neoplasms across evolving WHO classifications: a single-institution cohort study

Abstract BACKGROUND The management of pediatric central nervous system (CNS) neoplasms has historically been surgical resection, especially for low-grade tumors. The current therapeutic landscape is evolving as the WHO guidelines shift from a primarily histological to molecular classification. While standard-of-care protocols are established by multi-institutional studies, single-institutional analysis can demonstrate real-world implementation of these evolving treatment strategies. This study characterizes the initial treatment regimens in an institutional cohort of pediatric CNS tumor patients. METHODS A retrospective chart review of patients 8 months-17 years old diagnosed with CNS neoplasms who presented at our institution between January 2013 and June 2023. Patients with unconfirmed pathology were excluded. Data on initial treatment method and WHO year, classification, and grade was analyzed. RESULTS The cohort (N=84, mean age at diagnosis 7.8 years; 50% female) included WHO classifications for 2007 (44.0%), 2016 (39.3%), and 2021 (16.7%). WHO grade was available for 68 patients: Grade I (54.4%), Grade II (8.8%), Grade III (11.8%), and Grade IV (25.0%). Initial treatments included resection-only (79.8%), resection plus radiation (3.6%), resection plus chemotherapy (2.4%), radiation-only (2.4%), chemotherapy-only (2.4%), chemotherapy plus radiation (1.2%), and observation (8.3%). 95.3% of low-grade tumors (WHO Grades I-II) underwent resection-only treatment compared to 76.0% in high-grade tumors (WHO Grades III-IV). Stratification by WHO year showed low-grade tumors had consistently high rates of resection-only treatment (95.0% in 2007, 100% in 2016, and 85.7% in 2021), whereas high-grade tumors had progressive adoption of resection-only treatment (44.4% in 2007, 91.7% in 2016, and 75.0% in 2021). CONCLUSION This cohort analysis reveals distinct initial treatment patterns for pediatric CNS neoplasms, with high resection-only rates for low-grade tumors among classification years and an increase in initial resection-only treatment in high-grade tumors. Despite the limited sample size, this single-institution analysis provides real-world context for understanding the evolving, molecularly-driven therapeutic landscape in pediatric neuro-oncology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.1502
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

QLTI-26. Analysis of initial treatment patterns for pediatric central nervous system neoplasms across evolving WHO classifications: a single-institution cohort study

David A. Chesler, Siao Sun, Peter G. Gerace
Neuro-Oncology
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

QLTI-26. Analysis of initial treatment patterns for pediatric central nervous system neoplasms across evolving WHO classifications: a single-institution cohort study

David A. Chesler, Siao Sun, Peter G. Gerace
article en

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND The management of pediatric central nervous system (CNS) neoplasms has historically been surgical resection, especially for low-grade tumors. The current therapeutic landscape is evolving as the WHO guidelines shift from a primarily histological to molecular classification. While standard-of-care protocols are established by multi-institutional studies, single-institutional analysis can demonstrate real-world implementation of these evolving treatment strategies. This study characterizes the initial treatment regimens in an institutional cohort of pediatric CNS tumor patients. METHODS A retrospective chart review of patients 8 months-17 years old diagnosed with CNS neoplasms who presented at our institution between January 2013 and June 2023. Patients with unconfirmed pathology were excluded. Data on initial treatment method and WHO year, classification, and grade was analyzed. RESULTS The cohort (N=84, mean age at diagnosis 7.8 years; 50% female) included WHO classifications for 2007 (44.0%), 2016 (39.3%), and 2021 (16.7%). WHO grade was available for 68 patients: Grade I (54.4%), Grade II (8.8%), Grade III (11.8%), and Grade IV (25.0%). Initial treatments included resection-only (79.8%), resection plus radiation (3.6%), resection plus chemotherapy (2.4%), radiation-only (2.4%), chemotherapy-only (2.4%), chemotherapy plus radiation (1.2%), and observation (8.3%). 95.3% of low-grade tumors (WHO Grades I-II) underwent resection-only treatment compared to 76.0% in high-grade tumors (WHO Grades III-IV). Stratification by WHO year showed low-grade tumors had consistently high rates of resection-only treatment (95.0% in 2007, 100% in 2016, and 85.7% in 2021), whereas high-grade tumors had progressive adoption of resection-only treatment (44.4% in 2007, 91.7% in 2016, and 75.0% in 2021). CONCLUSION This cohort analysis reveals distinct initial treatment patterns for pediatric CNS neoplasms, with high resection-only rates for low-grade tumors among classification years and an increase in initial resection-only treatment in high-grade tumors. Despite the limited sample size, this single-institution analysis provides real-world context for understanding the evolving, molecularly-driven therapeutic landscape in pediatric neuro-oncology.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 27(Supplement_5)
Stony Brook School (US), Stony Brook Medicine (US), Stony Brook University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.