QOL-29. Evaluating the effectiveness of a tailored exercise intervention on neuro-oncology patient outcomes

Abstract Despite the known benefits of exercise as a supportive cancer care resource, evidence of its effectiveness in neuro-oncology is scarce and thus access to programming remains limited. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a tailored neuro-oncology exercise intervention on patient outcomes – the Alberta Cancer Exercise-Neuro Oncology (i.e., ACE-Neuro) study. ACE-Neuro was a multi-site type II effectiveness-implementation trial delivered in Alberta, Canada and included a 12-week tailored exercise and health coaching intervention to adult neuro-oncology patients. Measures included baseline and 12-week patient-reported outcomes and functional fitness, acute energy and fatigue assessed pre-/post-exercise sessions, and objective physical activity assessed across the intervention via a Garmin activity tracker. Descriptive statistics and linear mixed models were used to analyze the data. Across a 20-month recruitment period, n=62 participants were scheduled to begin the intervention, and n=51 completed (82.3%). Statistically significant improvements were observed for overall quality of life (p < 0.011) and the sub-domains of functional well-being (p < 0.018) and brain-specific concerns (p < 0.001). Resistance exercise levels (p < 0.005), balance (p < 0.009 right side and p < 0.002 left side), and aerobic fitness (p < 0.001) also significantly improved. General fatigue worsened from pre- to post-intervention (p < 0.048). Acute energy significantly worsened after each exercise session (p = 0.001) but significantly improved from baseline to 12-weeks (p < 0.001), while acute fatigue significantly improved across the intervention (p < 0.001). Objective physical activity during the intervention averaged 86.6 ± 57.51 minutes per day. ACE-Neuro was associated with improved patient-reported, functional fitness, and objective physical activity outcomes, contributing to the limited literature on exercise interventions in neuro-oncology. Ongoing work is needed to continue to tailor and deliver effective exercise interventions that meet the unique needs of this patient population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.1530
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

QOL-29. Evaluating the effectiveness of a tailored exercise intervention on neuro-oncology patient outcomes

J. Easaw, Margaret L. McNeely, Jonathan Low, Tanya Williamson et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Cancer survivorship and care
article

QOL-29. Evaluating the effectiveness of a tailored exercise intervention on neuro-oncology patient outcomes

J. Easaw, Margaret L. McNeely, Jonathan Low, Tanya Williamson, S. Nicole Culos‐Reed, Meghan H. McDonough, Tana Dhruva, Catriona Leckie, Gloria Roldan Urgoiti, Christine Lesiuk, L Capozzi, George J. Francis, Julia T. Daun, Jessica Danyluk, Emma McLaughlin, Paula A. Ospina, Paula de Robles, Allan S. Brett
article en

Abstract

Abstract Despite the known benefits of exercise as a supportive cancer care resource, evidence of its effectiveness in neuro-oncology is scarce and thus access to programming remains limited. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a tailored neuro-oncology exercise intervention on patient outcomes – the Alberta Cancer Exercise-Neuro Oncology (i.e., ACE-Neuro) study. ACE-Neuro was a multi-site type II effectiveness-implementation trial delivered in Alberta, Canada and included a 12-week tailored exercise and health coaching intervention to adult neuro-oncology patients. Measures included baseline and 12-week patient-reported outcomes and functional fitness, acute energy and fatigue assessed pre-/post-exercise sessions, and objective physical activity assessed across the intervention via a Garmin activity tracker. Descriptive statistics and linear mixed models were used to analyze the data. Across a 20-month recruitment period, n=62 participants were scheduled to begin the intervention, and n=51 completed (82.3%). Statistically significant improvements were observed for overall quality of life (p < 0.011) and the sub-domains of functional well-being (p < 0.018) and brain-specific concerns (p < 0.001). Resistance exercise levels (p < 0.005), balance (p < 0.009 right side and p < 0.002 left side), and aerobic fitness (p < 0.001) also significantly improved. General fatigue worsened from pre- to post-intervention (p < 0.048). Acute energy significantly worsened after each exercise session (p = 0.001) but significantly improved from baseline to 12-weeks (p < 0.001), while acute fatigue significantly improved across the intervention (p < 0.001). Objective physical activity during the intervention averaged 86.6 ± 57.51 minutes per day. ACE-Neuro was associated with improved patient-reported, functional fitness, and objective physical activity outcomes, contributing to the limited literature on exercise interventions in neuro-oncology. Ongoing work is needed to continue to tailor and deliver effective exercise interventions that meet the unique needs of this patient population.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 27(Supplement_5)
Alberta Health Services (CA), University of Alberta (CA), University of Calgary (CA), Kelowna General Hospital (CA), Cancer Care Northwest (US), Canadian Patient Safety Institute (CA), Green Cross International (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.