SURG-34. Real-world predictors of resection prior to stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: a multi-center study

Abstract Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is standard of care for brain metastases, yet the selection criteria for performing upfront craniotomy are inconsistently defined. Among 1172 patients from two institutions, we identified clinical and radiotherapeutic predictors of surgical resection prior to linear accelerator or Gamma Knife-based SRS. One institution’s data were randomly split into training and validation datasets. Multivariable logistic regression with stepwise selection showed that patients with a single brain metastasis (OR=3.18; 95% CI: 1.63–6.24; p=0.0007), lesion diameter ≥2.5 cm (OR=33.3; 95% CI: 12.2–90.9; p<0.0001), higher KPS (40–70 vs. 80–100; OR=0.46; 95% CI: 0.22–0.99; p=0.048) or with a neurologic deficit on presentation (OR=0.40; 95% CI: 0.20–0.80; p=0.0094) were more likely to receive resection prior to SRS. The model demonstrated strong predictive accuracy (Somers’ D=0.77 in training; 0.825 internal validation cohort; 0.809 external validation with data from second institution). Patients with single brain metastases who underwent resection experienced significantly longer survival, p=0.016. With available data, Cox proportional hazards modeling identified younger age (HR per 10-year decrease: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.81–0.93; p=0.0002), controlled extracranial disease (HR=0.73; 95% CI: 0.62–0.87; p=0.0003), and absence of cerebellar (HR=0.79; 95% CI: 0.67–0.93; p=0.0051) or brainstem involvement (HR=0.67; 95% CI: 0.52–0.86; p=0.0019) as significant predictors of prolonged survival when controlling for primary disease site. An extended Cox proportional hazards model that integrated radiation parameters also found that larger maximum target volume (HR=0.956; 95% CI: 0.931–0.982; p=0.0009) and lower total target volume (HR=1.048; 95% CI: 1.025–1.071; p<0.0001) were associated with improved outcomes. This analysis highlights predictors of surgical intervention prior to SRS for brain metastases. These findings reflect intuitive surgical decision making—namely the need for craniotomy in large, symptomatic lesions—and can thereby inform patient selection prior to SRS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.1591
Primary Topic
Brain Metastases and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SURG-34. Real-world predictors of resection prior to stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: a multi-center study

James E. Herndon, Peter E. Fecci, Pranav Warman, Aden Haskell-Mendoza et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Brain Metastases and Treatment
article

SURG-34. Real-world predictors of resection prior to stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: a multi-center study

James E. Herndon, Peter E. Fecci, Pranav Warman, Aden Haskell-Mendoza, Justus Adamson, Joshua Jackson, Gloria Broadwater, Eric Shaker
article en

Abstract

Abstract Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is standard of care for brain metastases, yet the selection criteria for performing upfront craniotomy are inconsistently defined. Among 1172 patients from two institutions, we identified clinical and radiotherapeutic predictors of surgical resection prior to linear accelerator or Gamma Knife-based SRS. One institution’s data were randomly split into training and validation datasets. Multivariable logistic regression with stepwise selection showed that patients with a single brain metastasis (OR=3.18; 95% CI: 1.63–6.24; p=0.0007), lesion diameter ≥2.5 cm (OR=33.3; 95% CI: 12.2–90.9; p<0.0001), higher KPS (40–70 vs. 80–100; OR=0.46; 95% CI: 0.22–0.99; p=0.048) or with a neurologic deficit on presentation (OR=0.40; 95% CI: 0.20–0.80; p=0.0094) were more likely to receive resection prior to SRS. The model demonstrated strong predictive accuracy (Somers’ D=0.77 in training; 0.825 internal validation cohort; 0.809 external validation with data from second institution). Patients with single brain metastases who underwent resection experienced significantly longer survival, p=0.016. With available data, Cox proportional hazards modeling identified younger age (HR per 10-year decrease: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.81–0.93; p=0.0002), controlled extracranial disease (HR=0.73; 95% CI: 0.62–0.87; p=0.0003), and absence of cerebellar (HR=0.79; 95% CI: 0.67–0.93; p=0.0051) or brainstem involvement (HR=0.67; 95% CI: 0.52–0.86; p=0.0019) as significant predictors of prolonged survival when controlling for primary disease site. An extended Cox proportional hazards model that integrated radiation parameters also found that larger maximum target volume (HR=0.956; 95% CI: 0.931–0.982; p=0.0009) and lower total target volume (HR=1.048; 95% CI: 1.025–1.071; p<0.0001) were associated with improved outcomes. This analysis highlights predictors of surgical intervention prior to SRS for brain metastases. These findings reflect intuitive surgical decision making—namely the need for craniotomy in large, symptomatic lesions—and can thereby inform patient selection prior to SRS.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 27(Supplement_5)
Duke University (US), Duke Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Brain Metastases and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.