QOL-16. ‘Living with Meningioma’: a longitudinal survey on patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes

Abstract Meningioma is the most common primary intracranial tumor, but its impact on patient-reported quality-of-life (QOL) is incompletely understood. To address this, we initiated a prospective, longitudinal cohort study to track the QOL, emotional, employment, and financial experiences of patients living with meningioma and report baseline findings here. 86 patients were recruited between September 2024 to April 2025. Electronic surveys captured demographics, clinical data, EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-BN20, and FACIT-COST. Median age was 57.5 years (IQR 47.5 to 67.5), 81.9% were female, 83.1% were White, 77.1% had a Bachelor’s degree or higher, and 56.6% earned ≥$100,000/year. Meningioma WHO grades were 71.8% grade 1, 25.3% grade 2, and 2.8% grade 3. Management included surgery (81.3%, 41.4% gross total resection), radiotherapy (19.8%), and surveillance (9.3%). Time since diagnosis was <1 year for 37.5%, 1-5 years for 37.5%, and ≥6 years for 25% of patients. On QLQ-C30, physical, social, and role scores approached norms, but composite cognitive (mean 76.3, 95% CI 71.1–81.5) and emotional (mean 69.6, 63.9–75.3) scores were lower. Highest-burden items included composite fatigue (mean 30.3, 25.0-35.5), worry (mean 39.4, 32.3-46.4), feeling tired (mean 38.2, 31.9-44.4), trouble sleeping (mean 34.9, 30.7-44.8), and needing rest (mean 37.8, 28.5-41.4). On QLQ-BN20, future uncertainty (mean 28.8, 23.4-32.3), drowsiness (mean 32.1, 26.1-38.2), and family disruption (mean 31.7, 24.8-38.6) were elevated. Fatigue was common, with 13.8% reporting fatigue before treatment and 47.1% after. Of non-retired patients (70.7%), 55.2% reduced work, 45.5% had not returned to prior levels, and composite fatigue levels were associated with both outcomes (P=0.01, 0.03). 24.3% of patients experienced financial toxicity (FACIT-COST <26). At baseline, this heterogeneous cohort of patients living with meningioma reported adverse QOL impact, particularly fatigue and emotional and cognitive sequelae. Longitudinal follow-up will track these findings over time, group data based on illness trajectory, and may identify opportunities for intervention to optimize survivorship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.1517
Primary Topic
Meningioma and schwannoma management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

QOL-16. ‘Living with Meningioma’: a longitudinal survey on patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes

David Ronan Raleigh, Christina Weyer Jamora, Naomi Hoffer, Ramin A. Morshed et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Meningioma and schwannoma management
article

QOL-16. ‘Living with Meningioma’: a longitudinal survey on patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes

David Ronan Raleigh, Christina Weyer Jamora, Naomi Hoffer, Ramin A. Morshed, Kanish Mirchia, Javier Villanueva-Meyer, William C. Chen, Jennifer Viner, Steve E. Braunstein, Ila Sethi, Minh Nguyen, Nancy Ann Oberheim Bush, Susan M. Chang, Zora Arum
article en

Abstract

Abstract Meningioma is the most common primary intracranial tumor, but its impact on patient-reported quality-of-life (QOL) is incompletely understood. To address this, we initiated a prospective, longitudinal cohort study to track the QOL, emotional, employment, and financial experiences of patients living with meningioma and report baseline findings here. 86 patients were recruited between September 2024 to April 2025. Electronic surveys captured demographics, clinical data, EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-BN20, and FACIT-COST. Median age was 57.5 years (IQR 47.5 to 67.5), 81.9% were female, 83.1% were White, 77.1% had a Bachelor’s degree or higher, and 56.6% earned ≥$100,000/year. Meningioma WHO grades were 71.8% grade 1, 25.3% grade 2, and 2.8% grade 3. Management included surgery (81.3%, 41.4% gross total resection), radiotherapy (19.8%), and surveillance (9.3%). Time since diagnosis was <1 year for 37.5%, 1-5 years for 37.5%, and ≥6 years for 25% of patients. On QLQ-C30, physical, social, and role scores approached norms, but composite cognitive (mean 76.3, 95% CI 71.1–81.5) and emotional (mean 69.6, 63.9–75.3) scores were lower. Highest-burden items included composite fatigue (mean 30.3, 25.0-35.5), worry (mean 39.4, 32.3-46.4), feeling tired (mean 38.2, 31.9-44.4), trouble sleeping (mean 34.9, 30.7-44.8), and needing rest (mean 37.8, 28.5-41.4). On QLQ-BN20, future uncertainty (mean 28.8, 23.4-32.3), drowsiness (mean 32.1, 26.1-38.2), and family disruption (mean 31.7, 24.8-38.6) were elevated. Fatigue was common, with 13.8% reporting fatigue before treatment and 47.1% after. Of non-retired patients (70.7%), 55.2% reduced work, 45.5% had not returned to prior levels, and composite fatigue levels were associated with both outcomes (P=0.01, 0.03). 24.3% of patients experienced financial toxicity (FACIT-COST <26). At baseline, this heterogeneous cohort of patients living with meningioma reported adverse QOL impact, particularly fatigue and emotional and cognitive sequelae. Longitudinal follow-up will track these findings over time, group data based on illness trajectory, and may identify opportunities for intervention to optimize survivorship.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 27(Supplement_5)
City College of San Francisco (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Meningioma and schwannoma management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.