QOL-30. Mind over Mattress: Impact of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia on Objective and Subjective Sleep in Patients with Primary Brain Tumors

Abstract BACKGROUND Over 20% of patients with primary brain tumors (PBT) report clinically significant insomnia, yet these symptoms are often undertreated. Our team conducted the first trial of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I)—the recommended, first-line treatment—in patients with PBT. Primary findings suggest this intervention was safe, feasible, and acceptable. Moreover, patients demonstrated improvements in self-reported insomnia severity, fatigue, and mood. The aim of this secondary analysis was to assess changes in subjectively- and objectively-derived sleep metrics using data from patients’ sleep diaries and wrist-worn actigraphy. METHODS Patients with PBT and insomnia (N=44) enrolled in a single-arm pilot trial of CBT-I and completed one-week subjective (Consensus Sleep Diary) and objective (wrist-worn actigraphy; Actigraph GT9X) sleep assessments at baseline (T0) and post-intervention (T1). Participants underwent six weekly group CBT-I telehealth sessions. Subjectively- and objectively-derived sleep metrics include total sleep time (TST), time in bed (TIB), sleep efficiency (SE), sleep onset latency (SOL), wake after sleep onset (WASO), number of awakenings (NOA), and perceived sleep quality (PSQ). We evaluated the accelerometer data using the GGIR package and conducted paired-sample t-tests to evaluate change in sleep metrics from T0 to T1. RESULTS Subjectively, data from participants’ sleep diaries revealed improvements in WASO (MΔ=-27.08, p<.001), SOL (MΔ=-27.04, p<.001), SE (MΔ=0.08, p<.001), NOA (MΔ=-5.42, p<.001), and PSQ (MΔ=0.60, p<.001). Both TIB (MΔ=-78.10, p<.001) and TST (MΔ=-36.64, p<.01) significantly decreased. Objectively, data from participants’ wrist-worn actigraphy revealed significant decreases in NOA (MΔ=-2.63, p<.001), SOL (MΔ=-19.46, p=.04), TIB (MΔ=-1.03, p<.001), and TST (MΔ=-0.90, p<.001). The accelerometer data did not reveal significant changes in WASO or SE (ps>.05). CONCLUSION CBT-I may lead to meaningful improvements in both subjective and objective sleep among patients with PBT. Larger, controlled trials are currently underway to confirm these preliminary findings and to further investigate discrepancies between subjective and objective sleep measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.1531
Primary Topic
Sleep and related disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

QOL-30. Mind over Mattress: Impact of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia on Objective and Subjective Sleep in Patients with Primary Brain Tumors

Youngdeok Kim, Kelcie Willis, Christopher Kleva, Jonathan Kenyon et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Sleep and related disorders
article

QOL-30. Mind over Mattress: Impact of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia on Objective and Subjective Sleep in Patients with Primary Brain Tumors

Youngdeok Kim, Kelcie Willis, Christopher Kleva, Jonathan Kenyon, Autumn Lanoye, Amber Fox, Ashlee R. Loughan, Jisu Kim, Mary Bridgman
article en

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Over 20% of patients with primary brain tumors (PBT) report clinically significant insomnia, yet these symptoms are often undertreated. Our team conducted the first trial of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I)—the recommended, first-line treatment—in patients with PBT. Primary findings suggest this intervention was safe, feasible, and acceptable. Moreover, patients demonstrated improvements in self-reported insomnia severity, fatigue, and mood. The aim of this secondary analysis was to assess changes in subjectively- and objectively-derived sleep metrics using data from patients’ sleep diaries and wrist-worn actigraphy. METHODS Patients with PBT and insomnia (N=44) enrolled in a single-arm pilot trial of CBT-I and completed one-week subjective (Consensus Sleep Diary) and objective (wrist-worn actigraphy; Actigraph GT9X) sleep assessments at baseline (T0) and post-intervention (T1). Participants underwent six weekly group CBT-I telehealth sessions. Subjectively- and objectively-derived sleep metrics include total sleep time (TST), time in bed (TIB), sleep efficiency (SE), sleep onset latency (SOL), wake after sleep onset (WASO), number of awakenings (NOA), and perceived sleep quality (PSQ). We evaluated the accelerometer data using the GGIR package and conducted paired-sample t-tests to evaluate change in sleep metrics from T0 to T1. RESULTS Subjectively, data from participants’ sleep diaries revealed improvements in WASO (MΔ=-27.08, p<.001), SOL (MΔ=-27.04, p<.001), SE (MΔ=0.08, p<.001), NOA (MΔ=-5.42, p<.001), and PSQ (MΔ=0.60, p<.001). Both TIB (MΔ=-78.10, p<.001) and TST (MΔ=-36.64, p<.01) significantly decreased. Objectively, data from participants’ wrist-worn actigraphy revealed significant decreases in NOA (MΔ=-2.63, p<.001), SOL (MΔ=-19.46, p=.04), TIB (MΔ=-1.03, p<.001), and TST (MΔ=-0.90, p<.001). The accelerometer data did not reveal significant changes in WASO or SE (ps>.05). CONCLUSION CBT-I may lead to meaningful improvements in both subjective and objective sleep among patients with PBT. Larger, controlled trials are currently underway to confirm these preliminary findings and to further investigate discrepancies between subjective and objective sleep measures.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 27(Supplement_5)
Virginia Commonwealth University (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Sleep and related disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.