SURG-82. Stereotactic biopsy in IDH-wild type glioblastoma (GBM) - a survival analysis and interrogation of prognostic variables

Abstract Maximal safe cytoreduction remains the optimal surgical strategy in GBM. Despite this, a significant proportion of patients are not amenable to resection. Stereotactic biopsy remains essential to provide an integrated diagnosis and guide further treatment. There is a paucity of recent literature examining survival variables of this cohort post the WHO 2021 classification. Single centre retrospective study of stereotactic biopsies in IDHwt-GBM patients between January 2014-December 2024. Patient demographic, performance status (PS), radiological, histological and outcome data were collected. MGMT-hypermethylated tumours were stratified into 5-10% vs >10% cohorts. Univariate and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed. Basal ganglia, thalamus, brainstem and corpus callosum defined midline structures. 394 cases were identified. Median age was 66 with a male:female ratio=1.77:1, 285 (72.5%) cases were PS0-1. Multifocal tumours accounted for 65.9% (259) of cases, of which 99 were multicentric. 184(46.7%) patients had midline involvement. Median survival(mOS) with further treatment and best supportive care was 7.5 months (95% CI: 6.47-8.23) and 2.1 months (95% CI: 1.60-2.53). Kaplan-Meier and univariate survival analysis demonstrated significant improved survival distributions for age less than 65 (Logrank-Mantel-Cox, p=0.0004) and pre-biopsy PS 0-1 (Logrank-mantel-cox, p<0.0001). These were also predictive of undergoing further treatment. Involvement of midline structures had reduced mOS compared to non-midline lesions (Logrank Mantel-Cox, 0.0005). MGMT hypermethylation was associated with improved mOS in patient undergoing adjuvant treatment (8.57 vs 7.63months, Logrank Mantel-Cox p=0.0145). Whilst degree of MGMT-hypermethylation did not demonstrate significance in mOS for the adjuvant treatment cohort (8.2 vs 8.6 months, p=0.1828), >10% MGMT-hypermethylation cohort demonstrated improved 2-year OS (17.5% vs 6.3%). Despite recent advances in therapeutics, inoperable GBM remains a challenging entity to treat. Here we quantify pertinent peri-operative factors which may be utilised to council patients and manage prognostic expectations. Poorer prognostic cohorts may be better served with enrolment in clinical trials or best supportive care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.1635
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SURG-82. Stereotactic biopsy in IDH-wild type glioblastoma (GBM) - a survival analysis and interrogation of prognostic variables

Mohamed Baraka, James Clerkin, Susruta Manivannan, Andrew Durnford et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

SURG-82. Stereotactic biopsy in IDH-wild type glioblastoma (GBM) - a survival analysis and interrogation of prognostic variables

Mohamed Baraka, James Clerkin, Susruta Manivannan, Andrew Durnford, Antony Kaldas, Paul E. Grundy, Ayesha Zafar, Joy Roach, Mohieb Hosainey
article en

Abstract

Abstract Maximal safe cytoreduction remains the optimal surgical strategy in GBM. Despite this, a significant proportion of patients are not amenable to resection. Stereotactic biopsy remains essential to provide an integrated diagnosis and guide further treatment. There is a paucity of recent literature examining survival variables of this cohort post the WHO 2021 classification. Single centre retrospective study of stereotactic biopsies in IDHwt-GBM patients between January 2014-December 2024. Patient demographic, performance status (PS), radiological, histological and outcome data were collected. MGMT-hypermethylated tumours were stratified into 5-10% vs >10% cohorts. Univariate and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed. Basal ganglia, thalamus, brainstem and corpus callosum defined midline structures. 394 cases were identified. Median age was 66 with a male:female ratio=1.77:1, 285 (72.5%) cases were PS0-1. Multifocal tumours accounted for 65.9% (259) of cases, of which 99 were multicentric. 184(46.7%) patients had midline involvement. Median survival(mOS) with further treatment and best supportive care was 7.5 months (95% CI: 6.47-8.23) and 2.1 months (95% CI: 1.60-2.53). Kaplan-Meier and univariate survival analysis demonstrated significant improved survival distributions for age less than 65 (Logrank-Mantel-Cox, p=0.0004) and pre-biopsy PS 0-1 (Logrank-mantel-cox, p<0.0001). These were also predictive of undergoing further treatment. Involvement of midline structures had reduced mOS compared to non-midline lesions (Logrank Mantel-Cox, 0.0005). MGMT hypermethylation was associated with improved mOS in patient undergoing adjuvant treatment (8.57 vs 7.63months, Logrank Mantel-Cox p=0.0145). Whilst degree of MGMT-hypermethylation did not demonstrate significance in mOS for the adjuvant treatment cohort (8.2 vs 8.6 months, p=0.1828), >10% MGMT-hypermethylation cohort demonstrated improved 2-year OS (17.5% vs 6.3%). Despite recent advances in therapeutics, inoperable GBM remains a challenging entity to treat. Here we quantify pertinent peri-operative factors which may be utilised to council patients and manage prognostic expectations. Poorer prognostic cohorts may be better served with enrolment in clinical trials or best supportive care.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 27(Supplement_5)
Essex Cardiothoracic Centre (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.