Improving Participation in Data Donation Studies: A Systematic Review of Factors Driving Participation and Evidence-Informed Best Practices

Data donation, a research approach in which users voluntarily contribute their personal digital data, offers a solution to the limitations of traditional self-reporting and digital trace methods by enabling the collection of comprehensive, ethically sourced usage information across multiple devices and digital interfaces. However, this promising method remains underutilized due to low participation rates. Therefore, this review pursued two integrated aims. First, to synthesize evidence on factors that influence three forms of participation: hypothetical willingness (stated intention in imagined scenarios), actual willingness (consent to donate when asked), and successful completion (following through with the full donation process). Second, to appraise existing workflows, frameworks, and methodological tools and integrate this appraisal with the factor synthesis to derive best practices for improving participation. We synthesized 35 articles, of which 14 examined factors influencing participation and 21 provide methodological guidance. Five key factors were identified: sensitivity of the data, privacy concerns, perceived autonomy and control over the donation process, complexity of the process, and participant characteristics. To overcome barriers related to these factors, we recommend maximizing participant privacy through robust data donation frameworks, enhancing transparency and user-friendliness, empowering participants by increasing autonomy and control over their data, and proactively addressing potential selection biases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science Computer Review
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393251395958
Primary Topic
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving Participation in Data Donation Studies: A Systematic Review of Factors Driving Participation and Evidence-Informed Best Practices

Ine Beyens, Amber van der Wal, Xiong Yu-zhang
Social Science Computer Review
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
article

Improving Participation in Data Donation Studies: A Systematic Review of Factors Driving Participation and Evidence-Informed Best Practices

Ine Beyens, Amber van der Wal, Xiong Yu-zhang
article en

Abstract

Data donation, a research approach in which users voluntarily contribute their personal digital data, offers a solution to the limitations of traditional self-reporting and digital trace methods by enabling the collection of comprehensive, ethically sourced usage information across multiple devices and digital interfaces. However, this promising method remains underutilized due to low participation rates. Therefore, this review pursued two integrated aims. First, to synthesize evidence on factors that influence three forms of participation: hypothetical willingness (stated intention in imagined scenarios), actual willingness (consent to donate when asked), and successful completion (following through with the full donation process). Second, to appraise existing workflows, frameworks, and methodological tools and integrate this appraisal with the factor synthesis to derive best practices for improving participation. We synthesized 35 articles, of which 14 examined factors influencing participation and 21 provide methodological guidance. Five key factors were identified: sensitivity of the data, privacy concerns, perceived autonomy and control over the donation process, complexity of the process, and participant characteristics. To overcome barriers related to these factors, we recommend maximizing participant privacy through robust data donation frameworks, enhancing transparency and user-friendliness, empowering participants by increasing autonomy and control over their data, and proactively addressing potential selection biases.

Social Science Computer Review
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.