Public Perceptions of Creeping Crises: Climate Change and Antimicrobial Resistance

ABSTRACT Creeping crises—gradually evolving, transboundary threats—challenge both governance capacity and legitimacy. While much research has focused on institutional response, less is known about how citizens perceive such crises. This article examines public perceptions of climate change and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) using survey data from the Norwegian Citizen Panel. We find that both are regarded as more serious threats to the world than to individuals, with AMR perceived as more severe overall. Worry is the strongest predictor of perceived threat, highlighting its importance in shaping how citizens interpret complex, slow‐moving crises. Trust in parliament and generalized social trust play smaller roles, although institutional trust more strongly shapes perceptions of climate change, reflecting its political salience. These findings highlight the importance of understanding and managing perceptions alongside objective risks: understanding how citizens interpret creeping crises is vital for legitimacy, communication, and effective governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Risk Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.70039
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public Perceptions of Creeping Crises: Climate Change and Antimicrobial Resistance

Per Lægreid, Anne Lise Fimreite, Lise H. Rykkja, Erla K. Løvseth
Risk Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy
Climate Change Communication and Perception
article

Public Perceptions of Creeping Crises: Climate Change and Antimicrobial Resistance

Per Lægreid, Anne Lise Fimreite, Lise H. Rykkja, Erla K. Løvseth
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Creeping crises—gradually evolving, transboundary threats—challenge both governance capacity and legitimacy. While much research has focused on institutional response, less is known about how citizens perceive such crises. This article examines public perceptions of climate change and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) using survey data from the Norwegian Citizen Panel. We find that both are regarded as more serious threats to the world than to individuals, with AMR perceived as more severe overall. Worry is the strongest predictor of perceived threat, highlighting its importance in shaping how citizens interpret complex, slow‐moving crises. Trust in parliament and generalized social trust play smaller roles, although institutional trust more strongly shapes perceptions of climate change, reflecting its political salience. These findings highlight the importance of understanding and managing perceptions alongside objective risks: understanding how citizens interpret creeping crises is vital for legitimacy, communication, and effective governance.

Risk Hazards & Crisis in Public PolicyVol. 16(4)
University of Bergen (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.