Advancing Retaining Wall Inspections: Comparative Analysis of Drone-Lidar and Traditional TLS Methods for Enhanced Structural Assessment

Accurate inspection of retaining walls is crucial for ensuring structural integrity and public safety. Current assessment methods rely predominantly on qualitative visual evaluations that inform numerical structural ratings. These ratings lack the comprehensive quantitative measurements that 3D imaging can provide. This study evaluates the feasibility and accuracy of drone-based lidar platforms for retaining wall inspection as an alternative to traditional terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) that improves accessibility on hard-to-reach sites and may increase efficiency on site due to preplanned flights. Data was collected from three representative walls exhibiting diverse conditions using TLS and drone-lidar. To provide additional information on the site to use for alignment and checks, both Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) control and total stations were employed. The study provides a comparative analysis of the accuracy and practicality of each lidar method, aiming to determine the most effective techniques for routine inspection applications given varying site conditions. When compared against a finely registered TLS ground truth, drone-lidar was found to have root mean square errors of 2.3 cm in areas with low vegetation and 24.2 cm in densely vegetated areas. The findings highlight potential improvements in the precision of retaining wall assessments, proposing a shift from current qualitative practices to reliable, data-driven evaluations. Key limitations in GNSS accuracy and sites with dense vegetation are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app152212008
Primary Topic
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing Retaining Wall Inspections: Comparative Analysis of Drone-Lidar and Traditional TLS Methods for Enhanced Structural Assessment

Alexandra Hain, Michael Grilliot, Sarira Motaref, Maxwell Wondolowski et al.
Applied Sciences
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
article

Advancing Retaining Wall Inspections: Comparative Analysis of Drone-Lidar and Traditional TLS Methods for Enhanced Structural Assessment

Alexandra Hain, Michael Grilliot, Sarira Motaref, Maxwell Wondolowski, Karen Dedinsky
article en

Abstract

Accurate inspection of retaining walls is crucial for ensuring structural integrity and public safety. Current assessment methods rely predominantly on qualitative visual evaluations that inform numerical structural ratings. These ratings lack the comprehensive quantitative measurements that 3D imaging can provide. This study evaluates the feasibility and accuracy of drone-based lidar platforms for retaining wall inspection as an alternative to traditional terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) that improves accessibility on hard-to-reach sites and may increase efficiency on site due to preplanned flights. Data was collected from three representative walls exhibiting diverse conditions using TLS and drone-lidar. To provide additional information on the site to use for alignment and checks, both Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) control and total stations were employed. The study provides a comparative analysis of the accuracy and practicality of each lidar method, aiming to determine the most effective techniques for routine inspection applications given varying site conditions. When compared against a finely registered TLS ground truth, drone-lidar was found to have root mean square errors of 2.3 cm in areas with low vegetation and 24.2 cm in densely vegetated areas. The findings highlight potential improvements in the precision of retaining wall assessments, proposing a shift from current qualitative practices to reliable, data-driven evaluations. Key limitations in GNSS accuracy and sites with dense vegetation are discussed.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(22)
University of Connecticut (US), University of Washington (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.