The Emerging Role of Ablation in the Treatment of Primary and Metastatic Cancer of the Liver

The traditional management of resectable colorectal liver metastases (CLMs) includes systemic therapy and curative (R0) surgery. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment options include R0 surgery, liver transplantation (LT), chemoembolisation, and targeted chemotherapy. Ablative techniques (radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation) targeting liver lesions were until recently considered suitable only for patients deemed unfit for surgical resection. However, over time, data suggesting the non-inferior results of radical (A0) ablation compared with radical surgery have started to emerge. Given the lower complication rate of ablative therapies compared with surgery, the question arises as to whether ablation has the potential to replace the role of surgery in the treatment of HCC and colorectal cancer metastases to the liver. In this review, we address the current evidence on the topic and its possible impact on future clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14228016
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Emerging Role of Ablation in the Treatment of Primary and Metastatic Cancer of the Liver

Andrzej L. Komorowski
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

The Emerging Role of Ablation in the Treatment of Primary and Metastatic Cancer of the Liver

Andrzej L. Komorowski
article en

Abstract

The traditional management of resectable colorectal liver metastases (CLMs) includes systemic therapy and curative (R0) surgery. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment options include R0 surgery, liver transplantation (LT), chemoembolisation, and targeted chemotherapy. Ablative techniques (radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation) targeting liver lesions were until recently considered suitable only for patients deemed unfit for surgical resection. However, over time, data suggesting the non-inferior results of radical (A0) ablation compared with radical surgery have started to emerge. Given the lower complication rate of ablative therapies compared with surgery, the question arises as to whether ablation has the potential to replace the role of surgery in the treatment of HCC and colorectal cancer metastases to the liver. In this review, we address the current evidence on the topic and its possible impact on future clinical practice.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(22)
University of Rzeszów (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.