Analysis and visualization of fraud detection patterns through data mining and classification using MLP and hybrid deep learning model

Fraudulent transactions represent serious risks in various industries and need enhanced detection and classification methodologies. The investigation goes into the issue of unauthorized transaction classification, emphasizing the necessity of accurate identification to prevent monetary damage and preserve system integrity. The study employs powerful data mining and visualization approaches to discover hidden trends accompanying fraudulent behavior utilizing historical fraud data. This work develops two distinct deep learning models for classifying illicit transactions. The proposed model uses two reliable deep learning models, multilayer perceptron (MLP) and a hybrid model combining one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM), for classification. In addition, this work utilizes unique analytical visualizations and deep learning models to address the issue of bogus transaction classification. The considered dataset exhibits a built-in imbalance, with an uneven proportion of legal and wrongful transactions. The considered MLP performed significantly well, with an accuracy of 99.64%, a precision of 99.47%, a recall of 99.63%, and an F1-score of 99.64%. On the other hand, the proposed 1D-CNN-LSTM hybrid model has a more effective accuracy of 99.76%, precision of 98.94%, recall of 99.57%, and an F1-score of 99.46%. Therefore, the comparative evaluation of these models suggested their effectiveness in detecting fraudulent transactions, although a better knowledge of their performance is essential. While the MLP model is superior in precision and recall, the 1D-CNN-LSTM hybrid model improves accuracy and recall. The application’s particular requirements decide the selection between these classifications. If accuracy and recall are crucial, the MLP model might be employed, while the 1D-CNN-LSTM hybrid model arises as a promising rival if an appropriate ratio of accuracy and recall is required. The findings reveal the usefulness of the MLP and the 1D-CNN-LSTM frameworks, enabling a more thorough knowledge of their strengths and shortcomings. This allows sensible choices to be made depending on the application’s unique aims, enabling ongoing attempts to enhance systems for identifying fraudulent activity.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Egyptian Informatics Journal
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eij.2025.100829
Primary Topic
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis and visualization of fraud detection patterns through data mining and classification using MLP and hybrid deep learning model

Egyptian Informatics Journal
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
article

Analysis and visualization of fraud detection patterns through data mining and classification using MLP and hybrid deep learning model

article en

Abstract

Fraudulent transactions represent serious risks in various industries and need enhanced detection and classification methodologies. The investigation goes into the issue of unauthorized transaction classification, emphasizing the necessity of accurate identification to prevent monetary damage and preserve system integrity. The study employs powerful data mining and visualization approaches to discover hidden trends accompanying fraudulent behavior utilizing historical fraud data. This work develops two distinct deep learning models for classifying illicit transactions. The proposed model uses two reliable deep learning models, multilayer perceptron (MLP) and a hybrid model combining one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM), for classification. In addition, this work utilizes unique analytical visualizations and deep learning models to address the issue of bogus transaction classification. The considered dataset exhibits a built-in imbalance, with an uneven proportion of legal and wrongful transactions. The considered MLP performed significantly well, with an accuracy of 99.64%, a precision of 99.47%, a recall of 99.63%, and an F1-score of 99.64%. On the other hand, the proposed 1D-CNN-LSTM hybrid model has a more effective accuracy of 99.76%, precision of 98.94%, recall of 99.57%, and an F1-score of 99.46%. Therefore, the comparative evaluation of these models suggested their effectiveness in detecting fraudulent transactions, although a better knowledge of their performance is essential. While the MLP model is superior in precision and recall, the 1D-CNN-LSTM hybrid model improves accuracy and recall. The application’s particular requirements decide the selection between these classifications. If accuracy and recall are crucial, the MLP model might be employed, while the 1D-CNN-LSTM hybrid model arises as a promising rival if an appropriate ratio of accuracy and recall is required. The findings reveal the usefulness of the MLP and the 1D-CNN-LSTM frameworks, enabling a more thorough knowledge of their strengths and shortcomings. This allows sensible choices to be made depending on the application’s unique aims, enabling ongoing attempts to enhance systems for identifying fraudulent activity.

Egyptian Informatics JournalVol. 32
Multimedia University (MY), Riphah International University (PK), Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology (PK), University of Kuala Lumpur (MY), Bahrain Polytechnic (BH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.