Safety net or sieve: Do Europe’s minimum income schemes reach the poor?

Today, nearly all EU Member States have a national Minimum Income Scheme (MIS) providing a social safety net to their citizens. Still, not all European citizens actually receive minimum income support when in need of it. However, there is still no clear-cut evidence about the extent of and the reasons behind the gaps in the actual recipiency of last safety nets. In what is one of the most comprehensive contributions in terms of country scope and methodological rigor, we investigate MIS’ recipiency in Europe and the beneficiaries’ profiles at the micro-level, focusing also on the pre-transfer poor population left uncovered from any income support. We also ask if those confronted with what we could label “new social risks” are overrepresented among minimum income recipients and among the uncovered. First, we show that the share of pre-transfer poor individuals effectively covered by means-tested income support varies a lot, with coverage ranging from under 5% of the pre-transfer poor population to upwards of 60%. While one would assume that MIS coverage rates are largely determined by the reach and adequacy of social insurance arrangements, that picture is not as simple. In fact, large swathes of the needy are uncovered by either type of scheme. The share of pre-transfer poor individuals who are left uncovered by both social insurance and social assistance ranges from less than 20% to almost 90%. A large share of social assistance recipients experiences what one could call new social risks, namely low-education, non-standard employment, and, to a lesser extent, foreign citizenship and single-parenthood. Among those not reached by last resort income protection, young and non-standard employed people stand out. Yet patterns are not very consistent, pointing to manifold national idiosyncrasies in coverage mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of European Social Policy
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09589287251390718
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety net or sieve: Do Europe’s minimum income schemes reach the poor?

Sarah Marchal, Ive Marx, Alessandro Nardo
1 citations
Journal of European Social Policy
Social Policy and Reform Studies
8.52
article

Safety net or sieve: Do Europe’s minimum income schemes reach the poor?

Sarah Marchal, Ive Marx, Alessandro Nardo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Today, nearly all EU Member States have a national Minimum Income Scheme (MIS) providing a social safety net to their citizens. Still, not all European citizens actually receive minimum income support when in need of it. However, there is still no clear-cut evidence about the extent of and the reasons behind the gaps in the actual recipiency of last safety nets. In what is one of the most comprehensive contributions in terms of country scope and methodological rigor, we investigate MIS’ recipiency in Europe and the beneficiaries’ profiles at the micro-level, focusing also on the pre-transfer poor population left uncovered from any income support. We also ask if those confronted with what we could label “new social risks” are overrepresented among minimum income recipients and among the uncovered. First, we show that the share of pre-transfer poor individuals effectively covered by means-tested income support varies a lot, with coverage ranging from under 5% of the pre-transfer poor population to upwards of 60%. While one would assume that MIS coverage rates are largely determined by the reach and adequacy of social insurance arrangements, that picture is not as simple. In fact, large swathes of the needy are uncovered by either type of scheme. The share of pre-transfer poor individuals who are left uncovered by both social insurance and social assistance ranges from less than 20% to almost 90%. A large share of social assistance recipients experiences what one could call new social risks, namely low-education, non-standard employment, and, to a lesser extent, foreign citizenship and single-parenthood. Among those not reached by last resort income protection, young and non-standard employed people stand out. Yet patterns are not very consistent, pointing to manifold national idiosyncrasies in coverage mechanisms.

Journal of European Social Policy
University of Antwerp (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Safety net or sieve: Do Europe’s minimum income schemes reach the poor? — Sarah Marchal, Ive Marx, et al. · Journal of European Social Policy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS