Re-evaluating the ‘who’ in environmentalism using latent profile analysis

Understanding who is currently (dis)engaged with environmental issues is important in targeting efforts to increase the momentum of environmentalism. However, previous research examining the sociodemographic groups associated with environmental (dis)engagement has produced inconsistent results. We contend that one reason for these inconsistencies is that the linear relationships between environmental engagement and independent sociodemographic groups that have been analysed in conventional approaches (e.g., regression) do not capture the roles of non-monotonic relationships and intersectional sociodemographic groups. To address these limitations of past research, we conducted latent profile analyses using data from Australia ( N = 1074), New Zealand ( N = 969) and the United States ( N = 1780) to understand how groups differ in their environmental beliefs, attitudes, and behaviours. We found that the most engaged and least engaged subgroups across all three countries are consistent with past research: an Environmental Activists profile associated with left-leaning, highly educated, White women; and a Disengaged Skeptics profile associated with right-leaning, older, less educated, White men. Going beyond the findings of past research, our latent profile analyses reveal a number of profiles with comparatively moderate levels of environmental engagement and conflicting attitudes and actions, associated with younger people, parents, and people of colour or with immigrant backgrounds. We discuss the theoretical implications of our novel findings for past research and the practical implications of our findings for strategic pro-environmental campaigns. • Across three countries we find consistent profiles of environmental engagement. • The profiles reveal non-monotonic relationships not captured by regression results. • Social intersectionalities are important for environmental engagement. • Our latent profiles may reconcile inconsistencies in past research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102848
Primary Topic
Environmental Education and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Re-evaluating the ‘who’ in environmentalism using latent profile analysis

Kelly S. Fielding, Winnifred R. Louis, Ava Disney
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Environmental Education and Sustainability
article

Re-evaluating the ‘who’ in environmentalism using latent profile analysis

Kelly S. Fielding, Winnifred R. Louis, Ava Disney
article en

Abstract

Understanding who is currently (dis)engaged with environmental issues is important in targeting efforts to increase the momentum of environmentalism. However, previous research examining the sociodemographic groups associated with environmental (dis)engagement has produced inconsistent results. We contend that one reason for these inconsistencies is that the linear relationships between environmental engagement and independent sociodemographic groups that have been analysed in conventional approaches (e.g., regression) do not capture the roles of non-monotonic relationships and intersectional sociodemographic groups. To address these limitations of past research, we conducted latent profile analyses using data from Australia ( N = 1074), New Zealand ( N = 969) and the United States ( N = 1780) to understand how groups differ in their environmental beliefs, attitudes, and behaviours. We found that the most engaged and least engaged subgroups across all three countries are consistent with past research: an Environmental Activists profile associated with left-leaning, highly educated, White women; and a Disengaged Skeptics profile associated with right-leaning, older, less educated, White men. Going beyond the findings of past research, our latent profile analyses reveal a number of profiles with comparatively moderate levels of environmental engagement and conflicting attitudes and actions, associated with younger people, parents, and people of colour or with immigrant backgrounds. We discuss the theoretical implications of our novel findings for past research and the practical implications of our findings for strategic pro-environmental campaigns. • Across three countries we find consistent profiles of environmental engagement. • The profiles reveal non-monotonic relationships not captured by regression results. • Social intersectionalities are important for environmental engagement. • Our latent profiles may reconcile inconsistencies in past research.

Journal of Environmental PsychologyVol. 108
The University of Queensland (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Environmental Education and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.