Profitable insecurities: trade mark law, misleading advertising, and body image perceptions in the United Kingdom

Abstract This article critically examines how brand names, slogans, and logos registered as United Kingdom (UK) trade marks for weight management solutions, health‐boosting supplements, and cosmetics are used in marketing communications to influence consumer behaviour. The analysis addresses concerns that these trade signs potentially mislead consumers or negatively impact their body image perception through a comprehensive examination of consumer protection legislation, advertising rules, and the trade mark law provisions dealing with marketing communications in the UK. The article argues that there are compelling reasons why trade mark law should align with advertising regulations when evaluating the registrability of potentially deceptive, offensive, or illegal trade marks for health and beauty products. Otherwise, by preserving the status quo, which allows the registration of promotional content that exploits body image insecurities, trade mark law risks becoming part of the problem rather than a potential remedy against harmful body image rhetoric.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Law and Society
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.70025
Primary Topic
Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Profitable insecurities: trade mark law, misleading advertising, and body image perceptions in the United Kingdom

Luminita Olteanu
Journal of Law and Society
Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
article

Profitable insecurities: trade mark law, misleading advertising, and body image perceptions in the United Kingdom

Luminita Olteanu
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article critically examines how brand names, slogans, and logos registered as United Kingdom (UK) trade marks for weight management solutions, health‐boosting supplements, and cosmetics are used in marketing communications to influence consumer behaviour. The analysis addresses concerns that these trade signs potentially mislead consumers or negatively impact their body image perception through a comprehensive examination of consumer protection legislation, advertising rules, and the trade mark law provisions dealing with marketing communications in the UK. The article argues that there are compelling reasons why trade mark law should align with advertising regulations when evaluating the registrability of potentially deceptive, offensive, or illegal trade marks for health and beauty products. Otherwise, by preserving the status quo, which allows the registration of promotional content that exploits body image insecurities, trade mark law risks becoming part of the problem rather than a potential remedy against harmful body image rhetoric.

Journal of Law and SocietyVol. 52(4)
University of Warwick (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.