Patient‐Controlled Sedation in Port Implantation ( <scp>PACSPI</scp> 2)—A Randomised Clinical Trial

Optimising pain management during subcutaneous venous port (SVP) implantation is essential for patient-centred cancer care. However, evidence-based approaches to minimise intraoperative pain remain underexplored. This trial evaluated the clinical effectiveness and safety of the propofol-alfentanil patient-controlled sedation (PCS) technique as an adjunct to local anaesthesia (LA) for pain reduction during SVP implantation. Adult cancer patients at two Swedish anaesthesia departments received either LA + PCS or LA alone for SVP implantation. The primary outcome was the maximum intraoperative pain score on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS). Safety outcomes included respiratory, haemodynamic and insertion-related complications. Secondary outcomes assessed patient satisfaction and procedural measurements. A total of 340 patients (median age 70 [interquartile range, [IQR] 61-76], 51.8% male) were recruited between January 2023 and November 2024. Median intraoperative NRS pain scores were similar between groups (2 [0-3] vs. 2 [0-3], p = 0.292), with pain scores ≥ 4 reported in 22.9% (LA + PCS) and 22.2% (LA) (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.57-1.60; p = 0.872). Hypoxia or obstructed airway occurred in 2/166 (1.2%) patients in the LA + PCS group and none in the LA group. Patient satisfaction was high in both groups (10 [10-10], p = 0.102). Optimal procedural conditions were reported more frequently with LA + PCS (96.4% vs. 82.0%; OR 5.84; 95% CI 2.36-14.44; p < 0.001), without affecting perioperative workflow. Propofol-alfentanil PCS does not significantly reduce intraoperative pain in patients during SVP implantation. Its routine use for pain reduction cannot be recommended. However, PCS may reasonably be offered to patients who prefer procedural sedation. EDITORIAL COMMENT: This randomised clinical trial found that adding patient-controlled sedation with propofol-alfentanil to standard local anaesthesia for subcutaneous venous port implantation does not have an impact on pain scores or patient satisfaction. Additional studies focusing on patients experiences and safety are recommended before implementing propofol-alfentanil patient-controlled sedation. Trial Registration: EudraCT number: 2021-003821-31; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05688384.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.70148
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient‐Controlled Sedation in Port Implantation ( PACSPI 2)—A Randomised Clinical Trial

Michelle S. Chew, Andreas Nilsson, Fredrik Hammarskjöld, Knut Taxbro et al.
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Patient‐Controlled Sedation in Port Implantation ( PACSPI 2)—A Randomised Clinical Trial

Michelle S. Chew, Andreas Nilsson, Fredrik Hammarskjöld, Knut Taxbro, Stefanie Seifert, Josip Ažman
article en

Abstract

Optimising pain management during subcutaneous venous port (SVP) implantation is essential for patient-centred cancer care. However, evidence-based approaches to minimise intraoperative pain remain underexplored. This trial evaluated the clinical effectiveness and safety of the propofol-alfentanil patient-controlled sedation (PCS) technique as an adjunct to local anaesthesia (LA) for pain reduction during SVP implantation. Adult cancer patients at two Swedish anaesthesia departments received either LA + PCS or LA alone for SVP implantation. The primary outcome was the maximum intraoperative pain score on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS). Safety outcomes included respiratory, haemodynamic and insertion-related complications. Secondary outcomes assessed patient satisfaction and procedural measurements. A total of 340 patients (median age 70 [interquartile range, [IQR] 61-76], 51.8% male) were recruited between January 2023 and November 2024. Median intraoperative NRS pain scores were similar between groups (2 [0-3] vs. 2 [0-3], p = 0.292), with pain scores ≥ 4 reported in 22.9% (LA + PCS) and 22.2% (LA) (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.57-1.60; p = 0.872). Hypoxia or obstructed airway occurred in 2/166 (1.2%) patients in the LA + PCS group and none in the LA group. Patient satisfaction was high in both groups (10 [10-10], p = 0.102). Optimal procedural conditions were reported more frequently with LA + PCS (96.4% vs. 82.0%; OR 5.84; 95% CI 2.36-14.44; p < 0.001), without affecting perioperative workflow. Propofol-alfentanil PCS does not significantly reduce intraoperative pain in patients during SVP implantation. Its routine use for pain reduction cannot be recommended. However, PCS may reasonably be offered to patients who prefer procedural sedation. EDITORIAL COMMENT: This randomised clinical trial found that adding patient-controlled sedation with propofol-alfentanil to standard local anaesthesia for subcutaneous venous port implantation does not have an impact on pain scores or patient satisfaction. Additional studies focusing on patients experiences and safety are recommended before implementing propofol-alfentanil patient-controlled sedation. Trial Registration: EudraCT number: 2021-003821-31; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05688384.

Acta Anaesthesiologica ScandinavicaVol. 70(1)
Linköping University (SE), Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Ryhov Hospital Jönköping (SE), Linköping University Hospital (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.