Conceptualisations of ‘translation’ in machine translation research and development

Abstract What constitutes translation when performed by a machine? This article explores this question by examining how machine translation (MT) researchers and developers conceptualise translation within their professional practice. Based on a series of expert interviews, the study uncovers divergent notions ranging from translation as systematic information transfer to translation as cultural mediation. These perspectives are then situated against linguistic and functional theories in Translation Studies, which provide contrasting reference points: the former treating translation as a primarily mechanical process, the latter as a purposive, human-centred act of mediation. Drawing on Social Construction of Technology (SCOT), the analysis highlights how conceptualisations of translation in MT R&D are shaped both by technological affordances — such as neural architectures and machine learning logics — and by broader social and economic contexts. The findings show that whether MT qualifies as translation depends less on a definitive resolution than on the lens through which the concept is framed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Translation Spaces
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.23029.tie
Primary Topic
Translation Studies and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conceptualisations of ‘translation’ in machine translation research and development

Michael Tieber
Translation Spaces
Translation Studies and Practices
article

Conceptualisations of ‘translation’ in machine translation research and development

Michael Tieber
article en

Abstract

Abstract What constitutes translation when performed by a machine? This article explores this question by examining how machine translation (MT) researchers and developers conceptualise translation within their professional practice. Based on a series of expert interviews, the study uncovers divergent notions ranging from translation as systematic information transfer to translation as cultural mediation. These perspectives are then situated against linguistic and functional theories in Translation Studies, which provide contrasting reference points: the former treating translation as a primarily mechanical process, the latter as a purposive, human-centred act of mediation. Drawing on Social Construction of Technology (SCOT), the analysis highlights how conceptualisations of translation in MT R&D are shaped both by technological affordances — such as neural architectures and machine learning logics — and by broader social and economic contexts. The findings show that whether MT qualifies as translation depends less on a definitive resolution than on the lens through which the concept is framed.

Translation Spaces
University of Graz (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Translation Studies and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Conceptualisations of ‘translation’ in machine translation research and development — Michael Tieber · Translation Spaces (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS