Contrasted effects of human pressure on biodiversity in the UK: a multi‐taxonomic assessment using airborne environmental DNA

Human activities have significantly modified habitats, resulting in a global biodiversity crisis. In this study, we leveraged the first national‐scale biodiversity survey based on airborne environmental DNA, comparing the effects of three human pressure indices increasing in complexity and scope – a binary urban–rural index, an index integrating land cover and pollutant concentrations as a proxy of human activity, and the composite human footprint index – across mammals, birds, insects, plants and fungi. While most taxa exhibited higher diversity in urban areas compared to rural ones, we uncovered more complex patterns using the landscape‐pollution and human footprint indices, including dual diversity maxima at both high and moderate levels of human pressure. We also show an effect of human pressure on community composition even when local species richness remained stable: regardless of the human pressure index, anthropogenic sites were mostly characterized by synanthropic and invasive species. Overall, our results underscore the complex interactions among anthropogenic pressures, taxon diversity and community composition, demonstrating the value of multi‐taxon analyses and multiple indices to better understand biodiversity patterns at large scales.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecography
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ecog.08196
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contrasted effects of human pressure on biodiversity in the UK: a multi‐taxonomic assessment using airborne environmental DNA

Orianne Tournayre, Joanne E. Littlefair, Andrew S. Brown, J Allerton et al.
Ecography
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
article

Contrasted effects of human pressure on biodiversity in the UK: a multi‐taxonomic assessment using airborne environmental DNA

Orianne Tournayre, Joanne E. Littlefair, Andrew S. Brown, J Allerton, Melania E. Cristescu, Nina R. Garrett, Elizabeth L. Clare
article en

Abstract

Human activities have significantly modified habitats, resulting in a global biodiversity crisis. In this study, we leveraged the first national‐scale biodiversity survey based on airborne environmental DNA, comparing the effects of three human pressure indices increasing in complexity and scope – a binary urban–rural index, an index integrating land cover and pollutant concentrations as a proxy of human activity, and the composite human footprint index – across mammals, birds, insects, plants and fungi. While most taxa exhibited higher diversity in urban areas compared to rural ones, we uncovered more complex patterns using the landscape‐pollution and human footprint indices, including dual diversity maxima at both high and moderate levels of human pressure. We also show an effect of human pressure on community composition even when local species richness remained stable: regardless of the human pressure index, anthropogenic sites were mostly characterized by synanthropic and invasive species. Overall, our results underscore the complex interactions among anthropogenic pressures, taxon diversity and community composition, demonstrating the value of multi‐taxon analyses and multiple indices to better understand biodiversity patterns at large scales.

EcographyVol. 2025(12)
National Physical Laboratory (GB), York University (CA), Springer Nature (United Kingdom) (GB), University College London (GB), McGill University (CA)
Genome Canada, Ontario Genomics, Government of Canada, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.