Beyond Rodents: Alternative Animal Models in Colorectal Cancer Research

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide, imposing a significant burden on public health. Despite the use of various therapeutic strategies, the prognosis for patients with metastatic and drug-resistant CRC remains poor, which underscores the need for further investigations into cancer mechanisms to develop more effective treatments. Rodents, particularly mice, are the most frequently used animal models for CRC research. However, as the demand for more precise simulations and higher ethical standards in animal experimentation grows, the applicability of rodent models may face increasing limitations. This review highlights a variety of non-rodent animals, including model organisms such as zebrafish (<i>Danio rerio</i>), fruit flies (<i>Drosophila melanogaster</i>), and <i>Caenorhabditis elegans</i> (<i>C. elegans</i>), as well as the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) model and mammals such as rabbits (<i>Oryctolagus cuniculus</i>), dogs (<i>Canis lupus familiaris</i>), and pigs (<i>Sus scrofa domesticus</i>), which have been utilized in CRC research. Each of these alternatives offers specific advantages in certain areas of cancer research. Their use has enabled new insights into the mechanisms of carcinogenesis, metastasis, and drug resistance in CRC, as well as the development of novel therapies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Published
2025-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262210874
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Animal testing and alternatives
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Rodents: Alternative Animal Models in Colorectal Cancer Research

Charles Dumontet, Jean‐Jacques Diaz, Solène Favier, Hichem C. Mertani et al.
2 citations
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Animal testing and alternatives
4.71
article

Beyond Rodents: Alternative Animal Models in Colorectal Cancer Research

Charles Dumontet, Jean‐Jacques Diaz, Solène Favier, Hichem C. Mertani, Frédéric Hollande, Frédérique Ponce, Marie Alexandra Albaret, Wei Xiong, Ting Wu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide, imposing a significant burden on public health. Despite the use of various therapeutic strategies, the prognosis for patients with metastatic and drug-resistant CRC remains poor, which underscores the need for further investigations into cancer mechanisms to develop more effective treatments. Rodents, particularly mice, are the most frequently used animal models for CRC research. However, as the demand for more precise simulations and higher ethical standards in animal experimentation grows, the applicability of rodent models may face increasing limitations. This review highlights a variety of non-rodent animals, including model organisms such as zebrafish (<i>Danio rerio</i>), fruit flies (<i>Drosophila melanogaster</i>), and <i>Caenorhabditis elegans</i> (<i>C. elegans</i>), as well as the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) model and mammals such as rabbits (<i>Oryctolagus cuniculus</i>), dogs (<i>Canis lupus familiaris</i>), and pigs (<i>Sus scrofa domesticus</i>), which have been utilized in CRC research. Each of these alternatives offers specific advantages in certain areas of cancer research. Their use has enabled new insights into the mechanisms of carcinogenesis, metastasis, and drug resistance in CRC, as well as the development of novel therapies.

International Journal of Molecular SciencesVol. 26(22)
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Inserm (FR), The University of Melbourne (AU), Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority (AU), Hospices Civils de Lyon (FR), VetAgro Sup (FR), Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon (FR), AGRF Ltd (AU)
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Institut National Du Cancer, Direction Générale de l’offre de Soins
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Animal testing and alternatives
4.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.