Does Brain Network Construction Choice Matter? an Empirical Study of Individual Networks from Static FDG-PET for Alzheimer's Diagnosis

This paper presents a comparative analysis of multiple methods for constructing individual graphs from static FDG-PET images, with a focus on Alzheimer's Disease (AD) diagnosis. We evaluate five methods, categorized into mean-based and probability density function (PDF)-based graphs, and compare them using two criteria: structural similarity between individual and group-level graphs, and their effectiveness as features in AD classification tasks. Our findings demonstrate the superior performance of PDF-based methods in capturing individual variability and improving classification accuracy, while also identifying strengths and limitations of methods. This study underscores the importance of selecting appropriate graph construction techniques and offers valuable insights for enhancing AD diagnosis through graph-based analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ipta66025.2025.11222050
Primary Topic
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Brain Network Construction Choice Matter? an Empirical Study of Individual Networks from Static FDG-PET for Alzheimer's Diagnosis

İsmail Burak Parlak, Eric Guedj, Julien Wojak, Nguyen Linh Trung et al.
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
article

Does Brain Network Construction Choice Matter? an Empirical Study of Individual Networks from Static FDG-PET for Alzheimer's Diagnosis

İsmail Burak Parlak, Eric Guedj, Julien Wojak, Nguyen Linh Trung, Mouloud Adel, Phạm Minh Tuấn
article en

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of multiple methods for constructing individual graphs from static FDG-PET images, with a focus on Alzheimer's Disease (AD) diagnosis. We evaluate five methods, categorized into mean-based and probability density function (PDF)-based graphs, and compare them using two criteria: structural similarity between individual and group-level graphs, and their effectiveness as features in AD classification tasks. Our findings demonstrate the superior performance of PDF-based methods in capturing individual variability and improving classification accuracy, while also identifying strengths and limitations of methods. This study underscores the importance of selecting appropriate graph construction techniques and offers valuable insights for enhancing AD diagnosis through graph-based analysis.

Vietnam National University, Hanoi (VN), Institut Fresnel (FR), Galatasaray University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.