From tweets to power: an integrative thematic review of political communication and platform governance on Twitter/X (2009–2024)

Introduction This integrative thematic review synthesizes the body of peer-reviewed studies on political communication via Twitter/X, aiming to map the conceptual and methodological landscape of the field as indexed in major databases from the platform’s inception in 2009 through 2024. Methods The review followed a PRISMA-style workflow for search, de-duplication, and screening, resulting in a final corpus of 52 articles from the Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus. Included studies were analyzed using a hybrid deductive-inductive thematic analysis. Results Findings are organized around five central themes: (1) actor strategy (personalization, timing, campaign orchestration), (2) audience behavior (engagement patterns, selective exposure), (3) platform architecture (affordances, algorithmic mediation), (4) trust and legitimacy (institutional credibility vs. visibility logics), and (5) methodological innovation (computational scaling vs. interpretive depth). The analysis reveals conceptual consolidation but also a structural imbalance in the field, characterized by the dominance of US and EU scholarship, limited cross-regional integration, and uneven theoretical convergence. Discussion The study argues for three key developments in future research: the adoption of mixed-method designs integrating discourse, network, and behavioral data; greater attention to non-Western contexts; and the explicit treatment of platforms as political actors, not just communication stages. Limitations include the restriction to two databases and a specific timeframe, the absence of a formal quality appraisal, and evolving platform conditions that challenge reproducibility. This review provides a roadmap for building more cumulative, comparative, and theory-driven research on the intersection of Twitter/X and governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Political Science
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1666104
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From tweets to power: an integrative thematic review of political communication and platform governance on Twitter/X (2009–2024)

Pedro Tomás Nevado-Batalla Moreno, Sonia Casillas Martín, Marcos Cabezas González, Andrés Naranjo-Vinueza
2 citations
Frontiers in Political Science
Social Media and Politics
7.73
article

From tweets to power: an integrative thematic review of political communication and platform governance on Twitter/X (2009–2024)

Pedro Tomás Nevado-Batalla Moreno, Sonia Casillas Martín, Marcos Cabezas González, Andrés Naranjo-Vinueza
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Introduction This integrative thematic review synthesizes the body of peer-reviewed studies on political communication via Twitter/X, aiming to map the conceptual and methodological landscape of the field as indexed in major databases from the platform’s inception in 2009 through 2024. Methods The review followed a PRISMA-style workflow for search, de-duplication, and screening, resulting in a final corpus of 52 articles from the Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus. Included studies were analyzed using a hybrid deductive-inductive thematic analysis. Results Findings are organized around five central themes: (1) actor strategy (personalization, timing, campaign orchestration), (2) audience behavior (engagement patterns, selective exposure), (3) platform architecture (affordances, algorithmic mediation), (4) trust and legitimacy (institutional credibility vs. visibility logics), and (5) methodological innovation (computational scaling vs. interpretive depth). The analysis reveals conceptual consolidation but also a structural imbalance in the field, characterized by the dominance of US and EU scholarship, limited cross-regional integration, and uneven theoretical convergence. Discussion The study argues for three key developments in future research: the adoption of mixed-method designs integrating discourse, network, and behavioral data; greater attention to non-Western contexts; and the explicit treatment of platforms as political actors, not just communication stages. Limitations include the restriction to two databases and a specific timeframe, the absence of a formal quality appraisal, and evolving platform conditions that challenge reproducibility. This review provides a roadmap for building more cumulative, comparative, and theory-driven research on the intersection of Twitter/X and governance.

Frontiers in Political ScienceVol. 7
Universidad de Salamanca (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Social Media and Politics
7.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.