The Methodological Challenges of Measuring the Duration of Strikes: Insights From Canada 1960–2024

ABSTRACT This article examines the methodological challenges involved with measuring the duration of strikes. On the one hand, several studies opt to calculate the average ‘duration’ of stoppages by dividing the number of working days lost by the maximum number of employees involved in work stoppages. On the other hand, many other studies use an average measure of the duration of strikes calculated by either using the arithmetic mean or median number of strike days taken across all strikes in a given period. While both measures have their use, they fundamentally measure different things. This article aims to theoretically explain the important difference between these two measures of strike duration, before presenting empirical arguments in favour of studying these measures of duration separately (primarily drawing on official strike data from Canada, 1960–2024).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial Relations Journal
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.70017
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Labor Movements and Unions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Methodological Challenges of Measuring the Duration of Strikes: Insights From Canada 1960–2024

Andy Hodder
1 citations
Industrial Relations Journal
Labor Movements and Unions
3.66
article

The Methodological Challenges of Measuring the Duration of Strikes: Insights From Canada 1960–2024

Andy Hodder
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article examines the methodological challenges involved with measuring the duration of strikes. On the one hand, several studies opt to calculate the average ‘duration’ of stoppages by dividing the number of working days lost by the maximum number of employees involved in work stoppages. On the other hand, many other studies use an average measure of the duration of strikes calculated by either using the arithmetic mean or median number of strike days taken across all strikes in a given period. While both measures have their use, they fundamentally measure different things. This article aims to theoretically explain the important difference between these two measures of strike duration, before presenting empirical arguments in favour of studying these measures of duration separately (primarily drawing on official strike data from Canada, 1960–2024).

Industrial Relations JournalVol. 57(1)
Birmingham City University (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Labor Movements and Unions
3.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Methodological Challenges of Measuring the Duration of Strikes: Insights From Canada 1960–2024 — Andy Hodder · Industrial Relations Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS