Position Statement on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Use in Evidence Synthesis Across Cochrane, the Campbell Collaboration, JBI, and the Collaboration for Environmental Evidence 2025

Evidence synthesists are ultimately responsible for their evidence synthesis, including the decision to use artificial intelligence (AI) and automation, and to ensure adherence to legal and ethical standards.Cochrane, the Campbell Collaboration, JBI, and the Collaboration for Environmental Evidence support the aims of the Responsible use of AI in evidence SynthEsis (RAISE) recommendations, which provide a framework for ensuring responsible use of AI and automation across all roles within the evidence synthesis ecosystem.Evidence synthesists developing and publishing syntheses with Cochrane, the Campbell Collaboration, JBI, and the Collaboration for Environmental Evidence can use AI and automation as long as they can demonstrate that it will not compromise the methodological rigor or integrity of their synthesis.AI and automation in evidence synthesis should be used with human oversight.Any use of AI or automation that makes or suggests judgements should be fully and transparently reported in the evidence synthesis report.AI tool developers should proactively ensure their AI systems or tools adhere to the RAISE recommendations so we have clear, transparent, and publicly available information to inform decisions about whether an AI system or tool could and should be used in evidence synthesis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Campbell Systematic Reviews
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.70074
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Position Statement on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Use in Evidence Synthesis Across Cochrane, the Campbell Collaboration, JBI, and the Collaboration for Environmental Evidence 2025

Paweł Jemioło, Ella Flemyng, Angelika Eisele‐Metzger, Gerald Gartlehner et al.
1 citations
Campbell Systematic Reviews
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
1.40
article

Position Statement on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Use in Evidence Synthesis Across Cochrane, the Campbell Collaboration, JBI, and the Collaboration for Environmental Evidence 2025

Paweł Jemioło, Ella Flemyng, Angelika Eisele‐Metzger, Gerald Gartlehner, Zoe Jordan, Biljana Macura, Anna H Noel-Storr, James A. Thomas, Candyce Hamel, Joerg J Meerpohl, Jan C. Minx, Matthew Grainger, Kylie Porritt
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Evidence synthesists are ultimately responsible for their evidence synthesis, including the decision to use artificial intelligence (AI) and automation, and to ensure adherence to legal and ethical standards.Cochrane, the Campbell Collaboration, JBI, and the Collaboration for Environmental Evidence support the aims of the Responsible use of AI in evidence SynthEsis (RAISE) recommendations, which provide a framework for ensuring responsible use of AI and automation across all roles within the evidence synthesis ecosystem.Evidence synthesists developing and publishing syntheses with Cochrane, the Campbell Collaboration, JBI, and the Collaboration for Environmental Evidence can use AI and automation as long as they can demonstrate that it will not compromise the methodological rigor or integrity of their synthesis.AI and automation in evidence synthesis should be used with human oversight.Any use of AI or automation that makes or suggests judgements should be fully and transparently reported in the evidence synthesis report.AI tool developers should proactively ensure their AI systems or tools adhere to the RAISE recommendations so we have clear, transparent, and publicly available information to inform decisions about whether an AI system or tool could and should be used in evidence synthesis.

Campbell Systematic ReviewsVol. 21(4)
Jagiellonian University (PL), Universität für Weiterbildung Krems (AT), University of Freiburg (DE), Ottawa Hospital (CA), University Medical Center Freiburg (DE), Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NO), Stockholm Environment Institute (SE), Cochrane (CA), Campbell Collaboration (NO), Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (CA), University College London (GB), The University of Adelaide (AU), Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE), AGH University of Krakow (PL), Cochrane (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.