Surface and Biocompatibility Outcomes of Chemical Decontamination in Peri-Implantitis Management

<b>Background and Objectives:</b> Peri-implantitis is a biologically driven complication that jeopardizes dental implant longevity. While chemical decontamination is frequently employed as an adjunct to mechanical debridement, its impact on implant surface integrity and cellular compatibility remains insufficiently defined. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of several chemical agents used in peri-implantitis treatment on the surface morphology and potential biocompatibility of titanium dental implants. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Twenty-five Ti6Al4V implants were exposed to one of the following agents: saline solution, 3% hydrogen peroxide, 40% citric acid, 17% EDTA, and a mixture (1:1) of citric (2%) and phosphoric (1N) acids. This in vitro study employed a 7-day immersion protocol to accentuate surface effects under controlled laboratory conditions, acknowledging that clinical exposures are substantially shorter. Surface topography was evaluated by Atomic Force Microscopy, while cellular response and corrosion products were assessed using Scanning Electron Microscopy. Surface roughness parameters were statistically analyzed. <b>Results:</b> Hydrogen peroxide induced selective corrosion of the β phase and formed a compact passivation layer that supported mesenchymal stem cell adhesion. Citric acid etched grain boundaries, producing localized roughness that also permitted cell proliferation. EDTA caused advanced grain dissolution and debris accumulation, increasing surface roughness but impairing cellular adhesion. The citric-phosphoric acid mixture led to the highest roughness values and visible corrosion debris. In all cases, macrostructural integrity of the implants was preserved. <b>Conclusions:</b> Chemical agents used in peri-implantitis treatment induce distinct surface alterations on titanium implants. Controlled use of hydrogen peroxide and citric acid may enhance surface biocompatibility, while aggressive protocols such as EDTA and acid combinations require caution due to their adverse effects on surface morphology and cellular response. These findings may inform the development of optimized decontamination protocols for clinical management of peri-implantitis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedicines
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13112748
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Surface and Biocompatibility Outcomes of Chemical Decontamination in Peri-Implantitis Management

Andra Piciu, Simion Bran, Dragoş Ene, Codruţa Saroşi et al.
Biomedicines
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Surface and Biocompatibility Outcomes of Chemical Decontamination in Peri-Implantitis Management

Andra Piciu, Simion Bran, Dragoş Ene, Codruţa Saroşi, Ioan Petean, Lucian Barbu–Tudoran, Mărioara Moldovan, Alexandru Meşter
article en

Abstract

<b>Background and Objectives:</b> Peri-implantitis is a biologically driven complication that jeopardizes dental implant longevity. While chemical decontamination is frequently employed as an adjunct to mechanical debridement, its impact on implant surface integrity and cellular compatibility remains insufficiently defined. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of several chemical agents used in peri-implantitis treatment on the surface morphology and potential biocompatibility of titanium dental implants. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Twenty-five Ti6Al4V implants were exposed to one of the following agents: saline solution, 3% hydrogen peroxide, 40% citric acid, 17% EDTA, and a mixture (1:1) of citric (2%) and phosphoric (1N) acids. This in vitro study employed a 7-day immersion protocol to accentuate surface effects under controlled laboratory conditions, acknowledging that clinical exposures are substantially shorter. Surface topography was evaluated by Atomic Force Microscopy, while cellular response and corrosion products were assessed using Scanning Electron Microscopy. Surface roughness parameters were statistically analyzed. <b>Results:</b> Hydrogen peroxide induced selective corrosion of the β phase and formed a compact passivation layer that supported mesenchymal stem cell adhesion. Citric acid etched grain boundaries, producing localized roughness that also permitted cell proliferation. EDTA caused advanced grain dissolution and debris accumulation, increasing surface roughness but impairing cellular adhesion. The citric-phosphoric acid mixture led to the highest roughness values and visible corrosion debris. In all cases, macrostructural integrity of the implants was preserved. <b>Conclusions:</b> Chemical agents used in peri-implantitis treatment induce distinct surface alterations on titanium implants. Controlled use of hydrogen peroxide and citric acid may enhance surface biocompatibility, while aggressive protocols such as EDTA and acid combinations require caution due to their adverse effects on surface morphology and cellular response. These findings may inform the development of optimized decontamination protocols for clinical management of peri-implantitis.

BiomedicinesVol. 13(11)
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest (RO), Babeș-Bolyai University (RO), National Institute for Research and Development of Isotopic and Molecular Technologies (RO), Bucharest Emergency University Hospital
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.