How Regulation 536/2014 Is Changing Academic Research with Therapeutic Radiopharmaceuticals: A Local Experience

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: This report examines the future of academic studies involving investigational therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals within the framework of Regulation (EU) No. 536/2014. It discusses the impact of Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) requirements (EudraLex-Volume 4-Good Manufacturing Practice guidelines) on the development of radiopharmaceuticals, based on local experience and analysis. <b>Methods</b>: The report was drafted by analysing multiple factors, including the European regulatory context regarding EMA guidance for investigational medicinal products (IMPs) and GMP requirements for radiopharmaceuticals, as well as position papers from various scientific associations. An analysis of all the relevant changes was conducted by a multidisciplinary team comprising radiopharmacists, nuclear medicine physicians, research experts and technology transfer specialists. They conducted a literature review to examine the clinical implications of the regulatory change and assess the impact of Regulation 536/2014 on academic clinical trials. <b>Results</b>: IRST has around 20 years' experience in radiopharmaceutical clinical research. From 2008 to 2025, it conducted 16 clinical trials with radiopharmaceuticals under the Directive, and it is currently promoting five studies under the Regulation. During this time, more than 1000 patients were enrolled. The transition was based on staff training in quality documentation, the constitution of a contract research organisation (CRO) to ensure data quality and transfer, careful budget planning, the evaluation of innovative business models and the role of a Contract Development and Manufacturing Organization (CDMO). These integrated approaches enabled IRST to transform regulatory constraints into an opportunity to enhance its organisational model, improve data reliability, and strengthen its position as a centre of excellence for radiopharmaceutical research and production. <b>Conclusions</b>: The implementation of EU Regulation 536/2014 has significantly impacted academic research centres, especially those specialising in radiopharmaceuticals. Adhering to Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) for therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals requires a considerable investment in infrastructure and personnel. However, the regulation also presents opportunities for research centres to enhance their capabilities. Meeting GMP standards can help institutions improve the quality and reliability of their clinical trials, potentially making them more competitive in the international research arena.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pharmaceuticals
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18111709
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Regulation 536/2014 Is Changing Academic Research with Therapeutic Radiopharmaceuticals: A Local Experience

Manuela Monti, Stefano Boschi, Valentina Di Iorio, Carla Masini et al.
1 citations
Pharmaceuticals
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
1.16
article

How Regulation 536/2014 Is Changing Academic Research with Therapeutic Radiopharmaceuticals: A Local Experience

Manuela Monti, Stefano Boschi, Valentina Di Iorio, Carla Masini, Maddalena Sansovini, Federica Matteucci, Erika Brugugnoli
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: This report examines the future of academic studies involving investigational therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals within the framework of Regulation (EU) No. 536/2014. It discusses the impact of Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) requirements (EudraLex-Volume 4-Good Manufacturing Practice guidelines) on the development of radiopharmaceuticals, based on local experience and analysis. <b>Methods</b>: The report was drafted by analysing multiple factors, including the European regulatory context regarding EMA guidance for investigational medicinal products (IMPs) and GMP requirements for radiopharmaceuticals, as well as position papers from various scientific associations. An analysis of all the relevant changes was conducted by a multidisciplinary team comprising radiopharmacists, nuclear medicine physicians, research experts and technology transfer specialists. They conducted a literature review to examine the clinical implications of the regulatory change and assess the impact of Regulation 536/2014 on academic clinical trials. <b>Results</b>: IRST has around 20 years' experience in radiopharmaceutical clinical research. From 2008 to 2025, it conducted 16 clinical trials with radiopharmaceuticals under the Directive, and it is currently promoting five studies under the Regulation. During this time, more than 1000 patients were enrolled. The transition was based on staff training in quality documentation, the constitution of a contract research organisation (CRO) to ensure data quality and transfer, careful budget planning, the evaluation of innovative business models and the role of a Contract Development and Manufacturing Organization (CDMO). These integrated approaches enabled IRST to transform regulatory constraints into an opportunity to enhance its organisational model, improve data reliability, and strengthen its position as a centre of excellence for radiopharmaceutical research and production. <b>Conclusions</b>: The implementation of EU Regulation 536/2014 has significantly impacted academic research centres, especially those specialising in radiopharmaceuticals. Adhering to Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) for therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals requires a considerable investment in infrastructure and personnel. However, the regulation also presents opportunities for research centres to enhance their capabilities. Meeting GMP standards can help institutions improve the quality and reliability of their clinical trials, potentially making them more competitive in the international research arena.

PharmaceuticalsVol. 18(11)
Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
1.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.