The misrecognition of intersectional justice claims: UK women’s workplace activism of the 1970s–1980s

This article explores the specific history of Black and Asian women’s workplace activism and wider campaigning on workplace equality in the UK during the 1970s and 1980s. Given the variety and richness of this history, I highlight particular aspects and examples to address the following questions: What were racially minoritised women’s experiences, analyses of, and campaigning concerning work in this time period, and how did these compare to those of white women? What were their relationships to trade unions and to white women’s campaigning around work? How have these experiences, perspectives and debates concerning workplace inequalities been framed (e.g. in media, academic literature and trade union accounts) across time and to what effect? While racially minoritised women often had priorities other than issues of equal pay and sex discrimination at work, many women who were active in Black women’s movements in this time period were also active in workplace organising. These voices and perspectives have often been excluded from published accounts, including many feminist ones. I argue that when such campaigning and activism has been included, it has usually been misrecognised in media, academic literature and trade union accounts as being exclusively about race or solely about class. An alternative reading would be to see it as being driven by their indivisible experiences as working-class racially minoritised women , which challenges persisting dominant framings of gender and histories of work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Women s Studies
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13505068251385381
Primary Topic
Labor Movements and Unions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The misrecognition of intersectional justice claims: UK women’s workplace activism of the 1970s–1980s

Ashlee Christoffersen
European Journal of Women s Studies
Labor Movements and Unions
article

The misrecognition of intersectional justice claims: UK women’s workplace activism of the 1970s–1980s

Ashlee Christoffersen
article en

Abstract

This article explores the specific history of Black and Asian women’s workplace activism and wider campaigning on workplace equality in the UK during the 1970s and 1980s. Given the variety and richness of this history, I highlight particular aspects and examples to address the following questions: What were racially minoritised women’s experiences, analyses of, and campaigning concerning work in this time period, and how did these compare to those of white women? What were their relationships to trade unions and to white women’s campaigning around work? How have these experiences, perspectives and debates concerning workplace inequalities been framed (e.g. in media, academic literature and trade union accounts) across time and to what effect? While racially minoritised women often had priorities other than issues of equal pay and sex discrimination at work, many women who were active in Black women’s movements in this time period were also active in workplace organising. These voices and perspectives have often been excluded from published accounts, including many feminist ones. I argue that when such campaigning and activism has been included, it has usually been misrecognised in media, academic literature and trade union accounts as being exclusively about race or solely about class. An alternative reading would be to see it as being driven by their indivisible experiences as working-class racially minoritised women , which challenges persisting dominant framings of gender and histories of work.

European Journal of Women s StudiesVol. 33(1)
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Labor Movements and Unions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.