Radical thresholds: manifestos of art education at MoMA (1943-2019)

This paper examines the evolution of art education through two manifestos produced within the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) in New York: I Believe (1943) and Art Education as a Radical Act (2019). Using a comparative qualitative methodology based on discourse and categorical analysis, the study analyzes 62 statements by 31 teaching artists from each period to identify continuities and transformations in pedagogical ideals. Results reveal that the 1943 manifesto, written during World War II, conceived art education as a democratic and therapeutic force that nurtures individuality, creativity, and civic responsibility. Conversely, the 2019 manifesto—emerging amid digital globalization, social movements, and institutional crises—redefined art education as a decolonial, inclusive, and socially engaged practice. The comparison shows a historical shift from liberal humanist ideals to critical, collective, and intersectional approaches that confront systemic inequality. Both manifestos reaffirm the role of art education as a transformative act, capable of resisting oppression and reimagining democracy, while exposing the persistent tensions between institutional power and pedagogical freedom.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arte individuo y sociedad
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5209/aris.102217
Primary Topic
Art Education and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Radical thresholds: manifestos of art education at MoMA (1943-2019)

Sara Torres Vega
Arte individuo y sociedad
Art Education and Development
article

Radical thresholds: manifestos of art education at MoMA (1943-2019)

Sara Torres Vega
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the evolution of art education through two manifestos produced within the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) in New York: I Believe (1943) and Art Education as a Radical Act (2019). Using a comparative qualitative methodology based on discourse and categorical analysis, the study analyzes 62 statements by 31 teaching artists from each period to identify continuities and transformations in pedagogical ideals. Results reveal that the 1943 manifesto, written during World War II, conceived art education as a democratic and therapeutic force that nurtures individuality, creativity, and civic responsibility. Conversely, the 2019 manifesto—emerging amid digital globalization, social movements, and institutional crises—redefined art education as a decolonial, inclusive, and socially engaged practice. The comparison shows a historical shift from liberal humanist ideals to critical, collective, and intersectional approaches that confront systemic inequality. Both manifestos reaffirm the role of art education as a transformative act, capable of resisting oppression and reimagining democracy, while exposing the persistent tensions between institutional power and pedagogical freedom.

Arte individuo y sociedadVol. 38(1)
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Art Education and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.