Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Composite Restorations Using Different Adhesive Systems

Background: Microleakage is a main challenge to durability and clinical success of a resin composite restoration. It can cause sensitivity after operation, secondary caries and ultimately restorative failure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the level of microleakage in composite restorations of Class V with three types of adhesive systems total-etch, self-etch and universal adhesive. Methods: The study was a randomized in-vitro experimental one, which was carried out between January and April 2025, in the Operative Dentistry Department in the XYZ Dental College. A sample size was obtained where ninety non-carious human extracted premolars was sampled and evenly separated into three groups (n=30). The total-etch adhesive was applied in Group A, self-etch adhesive in Group B and universal adhesive system in Group C. Composite resin was sealed on standardized Class V cavities, thermocycled and immersed in 2 percent methylene blue dye overnight. Due to penetration of dye under stereomicroscope, microleakage was assessed. The analysis of data was done with SPSS version 26.0. The One-way ANOVA and post hoc (Tukey) tests were used (p < 0.05). Results: In Group A (total-etch), there was a significantly lower mean microleakage score (0.87 + 0.56) as compared to the score of Group B (1.80 + 0.70) and Group C (1.27 + 0.61) with a significant difference (p = 0.002), which indicated as best sealers. Conclusion: Better sealing at the margins was demonstrated by total-etch adhesive system. These results should be assessed in future clinical trials in oral conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pakistan Journal of Medicine and Dentistry
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36283/ziun-pjmd14-4/023
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Composite Restorations Using Different Adhesive Systems

Beenish Jehan Khan, Hajra Soomro, Muhammad Moazzam, Mehwish Munawar et al.
Pakistan Journal of Medicine and Dentistry
Dental materials and restorations
article

Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Composite Restorations Using Different Adhesive Systems

Beenish Jehan Khan, Hajra Soomro, Muhammad Moazzam, Mehwish Munawar, Aneesa Khalid, Saleem Muhammad Saleem Qureshi
article en

Abstract

Background: Microleakage is a main challenge to durability and clinical success of a resin composite restoration. It can cause sensitivity after operation, secondary caries and ultimately restorative failure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the level of microleakage in composite restorations of Class V with three types of adhesive systems total-etch, self-etch and universal adhesive. Methods: The study was a randomized in-vitro experimental one, which was carried out between January and April 2025, in the Operative Dentistry Department in the XYZ Dental College. A sample size was obtained where ninety non-carious human extracted premolars was sampled and evenly separated into three groups (n=30). The total-etch adhesive was applied in Group A, self-etch adhesive in Group B and universal adhesive system in Group C. Composite resin was sealed on standardized Class V cavities, thermocycled and immersed in 2 percent methylene blue dye overnight. Due to penetration of dye under stereomicroscope, microleakage was assessed. The analysis of data was done with SPSS version 26.0. The One-way ANOVA and post hoc (Tukey) tests were used (p < 0.05). Results: In Group A (total-etch), there was a significantly lower mean microleakage score (0.87 + 0.56) as compared to the score of Group B (1.80 + 0.70) and Group C (1.27 + 0.61) with a significant difference (p = 0.002), which indicated as best sealers. Conclusion: Better sealing at the margins was demonstrated by total-etch adhesive system. These results should be assessed in future clinical trials in oral conditions.

Pakistan Journal of Medicine and DentistryVol. 14(4)
Jinnah Medical & Dental College (PK), Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.