Assessment of Quantitative Environmental, Social, and Governance Indicators and Their Relationships with Corporate Financial Performance in Construction Companies

This study investigates the relationship among environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and corporate financial performance (CFP) in the construction industry. ESG represents a company’s nonfinancial performance, whereas CFP reflects its financial outcomes. Given growing global attention toward climate change and corporate social responsibility, the adoption of ESG practices has become an essential component of corporate management. However, the construction industry has been significantly slower in adopting ESG compared to other industry sectors due to limited empirical evidence on the ESG-CFP relationship and a lack of implementation guidelines tailored to small- and medium-sized enterprises, which constitute the majority of the industry and often face challenges in securing resources for ESG initiatives. This research gap was addressed by collecting quantitative ESG indicators from publicly available ESG reports of nine general contractor firms in South Korea during a 12-year period. CFP was measured using financial ratios categorized into four categories: growth, profitability, liquidity, and efficiency. Panel regression analysis was conducted to examine the temporal effects of the ESG indicators on CFP. The results indicate that ESG indicators exert varying effects across different CFP dimensions depending on the nature of financial performance. Specifically, environmental indicators tend to enhance financial performance when aligned with socially desirable practices, whereas governance indicators show no consistent effect. A time-lag effect is also observed, suggesting that ESG initiatives require time to translate into financial returns. This study contributes to promoting ESG adoption in the construction industry by providing financial justification for ESG investments and identifying ESG management indicators commonly used by construction firms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Management in Engineering
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jmenea.meeng-7096
Primary Topic
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Quantitative Environmental, Social, and Governance Indicators and Their Relationships with Corporate Financial Performance in Construction Companies

Wonkyoung Seo, Youngcheol Kang, Moobin Kim
Journal of Management in Engineering
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
article

Assessment of Quantitative Environmental, Social, and Governance Indicators and Their Relationships with Corporate Financial Performance in Construction Companies

Wonkyoung Seo, Youngcheol Kang, Moobin Kim
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship among environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and corporate financial performance (CFP) in the construction industry. ESG represents a company’s nonfinancial performance, whereas CFP reflects its financial outcomes. Given growing global attention toward climate change and corporate social responsibility, the adoption of ESG practices has become an essential component of corporate management. However, the construction industry has been significantly slower in adopting ESG compared to other industry sectors due to limited empirical evidence on the ESG-CFP relationship and a lack of implementation guidelines tailored to small- and medium-sized enterprises, which constitute the majority of the industry and often face challenges in securing resources for ESG initiatives. This research gap was addressed by collecting quantitative ESG indicators from publicly available ESG reports of nine general contractor firms in South Korea during a 12-year period. CFP was measured using financial ratios categorized into four categories: growth, profitability, liquidity, and efficiency. Panel regression analysis was conducted to examine the temporal effects of the ESG indicators on CFP. The results indicate that ESG indicators exert varying effects across different CFP dimensions depending on the nature of financial performance. Specifically, environmental indicators tend to enhance financial performance when aligned with socially desirable practices, whereas governance indicators show no consistent effect. A time-lag effect is also observed, suggesting that ESG initiatives require time to translate into financial returns. This study contributes to promoting ESG adoption in the construction industry by providing financial justification for ESG investments and identifying ESG management indicators commonly used by construction firms.

Journal of Management in EngineeringVol. 42(1)
University of Seoul (KR), Yonsei University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.