Unpacking the Richness of Language Experience as a Predictor of Bilingual Children’s Language Proficiency

The richness of bilingual children's language experience is typically expressed as a composite score using parental questionnaire data. This study unpacks the concept of input richness by examining one such composite score (Q-BEx) to determine whether it reliably predicts children's language abilities, is no more complex than required, and as user-friendly as possible. Data were collected from 173 bilingual children aged 5 to 8 across three countries (France, Netherlands, UK) with various heritage languages in each. Parents completed the Q-BEx questionnaire and children proficiency tasks in their societal language. We analysed the predictive power of the original score compared to several alternative scoring approaches. Results showed (i) these alternatives were not more informative, (ii) scores including qualitative aspects of richness fared better than those with only quantitative variables, (iii) the latent variables underlying richness were comparable across languages, and (iv) whether parental education was included made little difference.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Child Language
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000925100305
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Language Development and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unpacking the Richness of Language Experience as a Predictor of Bilingual Children’s Language Proficiency

Ludovica Serratrice, Cécile De Cat, Laurice Tuller, Philippe Prévost et al.
1 citations
Journal of Child Language
Language Development and Disorders
3.44
article

Unpacking the Richness of Language Experience as a Predictor of Bilingual Children’s Language Proficiency

Ludovica Serratrice, Cécile De Cat, Laurice Tuller, Philippe Prévost, Arief Gusnanto, Sharon Unsworth, Draško Kašćelan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The richness of bilingual children's language experience is typically expressed as a composite score using parental questionnaire data. This study unpacks the concept of input richness by examining one such composite score (Q-BEx) to determine whether it reliably predicts children's language abilities, is no more complex than required, and as user-friendly as possible. Data were collected from 173 bilingual children aged 5 to 8 across three countries (France, Netherlands, UK) with various heritage languages in each. Parents completed the Q-BEx questionnaire and children proficiency tasks in their societal language. We analysed the predictive power of the original score compared to several alternative scoring approaches. Results showed (i) these alternatives were not more informative, (ii) scores including qualitative aspects of richness fared better than those with only quantitative variables, (iii) the latent variables underlying richness were comparable across languages, and (iv) whether parental education was included made little difference.

Journal of Child Language
University of Essex (GB), Université de Tours (FR), University of Leeds (GB), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Centre for Arctic Gas Hydrate, Environment and Climate (NO), Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (NL), University of Reading (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Language Development and Disorders
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.