Comparison of two digital PCR platforms for quantification of genetically modified soybean events

In the European Union, the food and feed containing more than 0.9% of approved genetically modified organisms (GMOs) per ingredient must be labeled before placed on the market. In this legislative context, the official control laboratories have to perform validated PCR assays, according to the principles and requirements of ISO/IEC 17025 standard, regarding event-specific methods for the detection, identification and quantification of GMOs. In recent years, with the advent of digital PCR (dPCR) techniques, a growing number of laboratories have transferred the previously validated real-time PCR testings into a dPCR format. Compared to real-time PCR, the dPCR offers the advantage to provide accurate quantification without the need for external calibration samples, show less sensitivity to PCR inhibitors and is more suitable for multiplexing. In this study, an <i>in-house</i> validation of quantitative duplex dPCR methods was performed involving MON-04032-6 and MON89788 assays with the lectin reference gene, on the two different platforms Bio-Rad QX200 and Qiagen QIAcuity. All evaluated data and the validation parameters agree with the acceptance criteria validation performance parameters according to the JRC Guidance documents and technical reports in both platforms. The duplex PCR methods here investigated are equivalent in terms of performance to the singleplex real-time PCR method and suitable to perform a collaborative trial for a full validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
GM crops & food
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2025.2583781
Primary Topic
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of two digital PCR platforms for quantification of genetically modified soybean events

Ugo Marchesi, Alessandra Barbante, Davide La Rocca, D. Villa et al.
GM crops & food
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
article

Comparison of two digital PCR platforms for quantification of genetically modified soybean events

Ugo Marchesi, Alessandra Barbante, Davide La Rocca, D. Villa, Katia Spinella, Sara Ciuffa, E. Perri, Daniela Verginelli
article en

Abstract

In the European Union, the food and feed containing more than 0.9% of approved genetically modified organisms (GMOs) per ingredient must be labeled before placed on the market. In this legislative context, the official control laboratories have to perform validated PCR assays, according to the principles and requirements of ISO/IEC 17025 standard, regarding event-specific methods for the detection, identification and quantification of GMOs. In recent years, with the advent of digital PCR (dPCR) techniques, a growing number of laboratories have transferred the previously validated real-time PCR testings into a dPCR format. Compared to real-time PCR, the dPCR offers the advantage to provide accurate quantification without the need for external calibration samples, show less sensitivity to PCR inhibitors and is more suitable for multiplexing. In this study, an <i>in-house</i> validation of quantitative duplex dPCR methods was performed involving MON-04032-6 and MON89788 assays with the lectin reference gene, on the two different platforms Bio-Rad QX200 and Qiagen QIAcuity. All evaluated data and the validation parameters agree with the acceptance criteria validation performance parameters according to the JRC Guidance documents and technical reports in both platforms. The duplex PCR methods here investigated are equivalent in terms of performance to the singleplex real-time PCR method and suitable to perform a collaborative trial for a full validation.

GM crops & foodVol. 16(1)
123 Certification (Canada) (CA), Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Regioni Lazio e Toscana (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.